*edited to correct conversion in title

  • andrei_chiffa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, no - it’s just as scientists predicted. In the worst-case “no-mitigation” scenario and with attempts from them to explain that +2 global will likely be +10 in peak temperature increase over land (read US, Europe, Asia). As in, both mean and std will increase, but without ocean’s mitigation over land.

    Fucked is not the correct word - there is a +50 predicted before the end of decade in Strasbourg, where I am from. There is not a single building built there made to resist that kind of temperatures, nor a single tree or crop that could stand that for a day.

    And it’s a relatively “safe” area as far as long-term projections go…

    • Clbull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fucked is not the correct word - there is a +50 predicted before the end of decade in Strasbourg, where I am from. There is not a single building built there made to resist that kind of temperatures, nor a single tree or crop that could stand that for a day.

      And it’s a relatively “safe” area as far as long-term projections go…

      I would love to read the source on this, not because I think it’s bullshit but because that is pretty fucking alarming.