Oh no, we should tell them! Someone get Big Balls on the horn, stat!
Hail Satan.
THE FINALS fanatic, join us at !THE_FINALS@fedia.io
THE FINALS: Season 4 Power Shift - #45 Worldwide
Oh no, we should tell them! Someone get Big Balls on the horn, stat!
Not mad.
This thread has now occupied 90% of your comment history, tho. Isn’t that neat? For me, you’re a blip on my radar; but for you, I’m nearly your entire account. Kinda makes you look obsessive.
You seem to be the one that’s mad.
It’s not. What it is, is on-brand for you, though. Justifying the mistreatment of others has kinda been your whole “thing” so far.
That’s not something to be proud of
Neither is posting the Hot Fuzz “shame” gif in response to a CEO being named.
Guess we’re not so different after all.
I can always out-petty you.
What, you mean the comment that was removed?
I don’t see you as a mod of any community.
I’m here and replying, but not bothered or angry, and not trying to get the last word in. But some pesky “1” keeps showing up in my notifications, and it’s my duty as a certified Good Boy of the Internet to never leave a fellow Lemming hanging!
And your comment history is under 1 page, wasn’t exactly deep research. The question of “who even is this nerd?” was answered pretty quickly.
Oh no, not at all. Nobody’s reading this, nobody cares. Besides, I already got the only word in as far as this conversation is concerned, since you never actually had anything to say at all in the first place.
You see, I’ve been on the internet a long time. I can always out-petty you. I have nothing to gain, but nothing to lose, either.
Oh, maybe you are saying the thing now. It’s hard to tell, since your entire comment history contains zero substance whatsoever, so I can’t really discern when you’re trying to actually communicate.
You forgot the > that time. Now it just looks like you’re saying the thing instead of quoting me saying the thing, silly!
I’ll take that as a yes.
So that’s a confirmation, then?
You’re the one making the scatilogical requests over here, not me.
Will you be providing it?
Have a nice day.
The headline says he swatted himself “to look like a victim”, even though he specifically says “I swatted myself like 3 times to test my methods”.
While throwing the police off his trail may have been a beneficial (for him) side-effect, it’s not what he says the reason is. No quote from the article says that trying to “look like a victim” was part of his motive to begin with. The only line in the article that actually mentions this is a parenthetical speculation from the author.
Even though it’s minor, that sort of inconsistency in the headline feels like very irresponsible reporting. Maybe there’s other testimony in the case that backs that up; but if so, it isn’t mentioned anywhere in the article.
I fear this is meant to be challenged, and will eventually be used to get SCROTUS to block all mail-in abortion pills, nationwide.