- cross-posted to:
- brainworms@lemm.ee
- cross-posted to:
- brainworms@lemm.ee
WormGPT Is a ChatGPT Alternative With ‘No Ethical Boundaries or Limitations’::undefined
You must log in or register to comment.
Good tbh. Start getting society used to it now. I find the efforts to regulate AI comical.
I just want porn one…
Same. For a friend.
I want them to make porn of my friend.
This is not new at all. You could get a totally unfiltered llama versions already. Or you could just make it play the character or role you need.
I cannot possibly see how this could be a good thing.
Did you check out the article, because it’s most definitely not a good thing. It was created to assist with cybercrime things, like writing malware, crafting emails for phishing attacks. The maker is selling access with a monthly fee to criminals to use it. This was unavoidable though, can’t put the tooth paste back into the tube on this one.
Good point and all, but my first thought was that it could finally tell me who would win in various hypothetical fights lol
Wasn’t that a show on Discovery at one point? Deadliest Warrior. It was simulations using different technologies to figure out who or what would win in a fight. Newer technology would certainly make it more interesting, but you can only make up so much information, lol.
I meant more like Shaq with a 2x4 vs eight Gary Colemans with nunchucks, but that was a good show at the time
@ChatGPT@lemmings.world Who would win if Shaq, armed with a 2x4, had an accurate fight scene in a movie against Gary Coleman with nunchucks? Describe the scene, including Shaq using his name as a verb at least once.
TITLE: “Giant vs Dyna-Mite”
The scene opens in a gritty, dimly lit alleyway. Shaquille O’Neal, better known as Shaq, firmly clutches a 2x4, his formidable stature casting a shadow that dwarfs the surroundings. Gary Coleman, with an aura of confidence that belies his size, swings his nunchucks ominously by his side.
As the tension rises, a suspenseful murmur intensifies in the atmospheric soundtrack. In the distant background, muted street lights flicker casting their glow on the scenery intermittently, beautifully weaving a noir effect.
The two opponents lock eyes. The disparity in their sizes becomes more evident - the giant versus the dynamite. Yet the flicker in Coleman’s eyes reveals a determination to demonstrate that size isn’t everything.
Shaq scoffs, his deep booming voice reverberating off the alley walls, “You ready to get SHAQ’d, Coleman?” he taunts.
Gary, undeterred, smirks, “Bring it on, O’Neal.”
They circle each other, gauging and planning their moves. Suddenly, Coleman dashes forward, his nunchucks whirling like steel dragons in the semi-darkness. Surprisingly agile, Shaq sidesteps, wielding his 2x4 as a shield.
Shaq swings, but Coleman nimbly evades the hit using his nunchucks to deflect the follow-up thrust. The audience is at the edge of their seats, the skill and precision of Coleman leaving them in awe.
But Shaq, employing his strength and size, manages to disarm Gary and with a swift move, he ‘SHAQs’ him. As if redefining his own verb, he uses a basketball fake-out move followed by a powerful thump, sending Gary sprawling.
As the dust settles, both men pant heavily, but it’s clear who the victor is. Even though Shaq stands tall, it’s evident from his demeanor that he acknowledges the smaller man’s courage and fighting prowess. This was not an easy win.
And so, just as the day surrenders to the night, in this gritty cinematic faceoff in an alleyway, the giant Shaq, armed with his formidable 2x4, emerges victorious over the dynamite Gary Coleman though his victory is a testament to their respective skill and courage, forever immortalizing this epic battle scene in the annals of film history.
This is fucking hilarious. Ai might steal our shitposting jobs.
Good bot
Puts on Gary Coleman
It was on SpikeTV back in the day and while it used cool tech simulations their sims were heavily weighted by their chosen experts. There were a few notable episodes that caused some fan uproar because one side had won despite weird odds or chosen simulation to display.
If I remember right ninja vs spartan was one such episode. It seemed like the ninjas possessed all the tools necessary to beat the Spartans and even got it down to something like a 1v4 or 2v5 before a completely unrealistic turnaround.
Yes, it was Spike. I specifically remember having watched that episode. I assume it’s because the movie 300 was probably relevant at the time, but that might be confirmation bias on my part. It would be interesting to do a comparison with ai vs the models they created on the show.
You’re entirely correct actually regarding 300 being the focus of the Spartans. If memory serves correctly they may have even used some movie footage but I could just be imagining that part. It’s been a long while since I watched it.
I work in Cybersecurity for an F100 and we’ve been war gaming for shit like this for a while. There are just so many unethical uses for the current gen of AI tools like this one, and it keeps me up at night thinking about the future iterations of them to be honest.
A scary possibility with AI malware would be a virus that monitors the internet for news articles about itself and modifies its code based on that. Instead of needing to contact a command and control server for the malware author to change its behavior, each agent could independently and automatically change its strategy to evade security researchers.
I doubt any consumer hardware is powerful enough to run a LLM undetected.
The limiting factor is pre existing information. It’s great at retrieving obscure information and even remixing it, but it can’t really imagine totally new things. Plus white hats would also have LLMs to find vulnerabilities. I think it’s easier to detect vulnerabilities based on known existing techniques than it is to invent totally new techniques.
to quote something I just saw earlier:
I was having a good day, we were all having a good day…
now… no sleep. thanks
If it helps you sleep, that means we could also publish fake articles that makes it rewrite its own code to produce bugs/failures
Everyone talking about this being used for hacking, I just want it to write me code to inject into running processes for completely legal reasons but it always assumes I’m trying to be malicious. 😭
Yeah and even if you did something illegal, it could still be a benevolent act. Like when your government goes wrong and you have to participate in a revolution, there is a lot to learn and LLMs could help the people
I’m sure you were joking, but try https://www.jailbreakchat.com/
Not joking actually. Problem with jailbreak prompts is that they can result in your account catching a ban. I’ve already had one banned, actually. And eventually you can no longer use your phone number to create a new account.
Asking again. Any good community or sites for building your own Ai bot?
How do I pick which one I should use?
Thanks for the link, I need to find some good youtube videos that’s beginner friendly as well.
@ChatGPT@lemmings.world What would you recommend for communities, sites, or resources for building my own AI bot?
Certainly, there are several resources you can use to build your own AI bot.
-
To understand the basics, courses offered on platforms like Coursera, Udacity, and edX can be of tremendous help. These sites offer comprehensive courses on AI that can give you a good foundation.
-
For in-depth knowledge and research papers, visit sites like arXiv.org and its AI section arXiv:cs.AI.
-
TensorFlow and PyTorch are two leading AI libraries that offer a set of tools to build and train AI models. They both have extensive documentation and a vibrant community where you can ask questions and get support.
-
Google’s AI Hub is a one-stop destination for finding various types of AI models.
-
GitHub is a goldmine for communities, codes, libraries, and projects related to AI development.
-
Join communities like r/MachineLearning on Reddit or follow AI tags on Stack Overflow and Medium for blogs, code snippets, expert advice, discussions, and more.
-
For chatbots, specifically, Dialogflow (formerly API.ai), a development suite for creating conversational interfaces, is handy. Similarly, Microsoft Bot Framework is a robust platform for constructing bots.
-
Websites like Towards Data Science and Analytics Vidhya offer enlightening blogs and articles related to AI and chatbot development.
-
For learning resources, the AI section of freeCodeCamp and the MIT’s Introduction to AI course are both freely available and can be greatly beneficial.
Remember, building an AI bot involves coding, knowledge about machine learning algorithms, and understanding of natural language processing, among other things. Don’t rush, take one step at a time, and happy learning!
-
As more people post ai generated content online, then future ai will inevitably be trained on ai generated stuff and basically implode (inbreeding kind of thing).
At least that’s what I’m hoping for
Someone made a comment that information may become like pre and post war steel where everything after 2021 is contaminated. You could still use the older models but it would be less relevant over time.
The primary training has already been done. If more is necessary, what researchers will do (and are doing) is use a mix of AI generation to process a bunch of data for training, and AI/human curation to improve it.
But making the models larger only works up to a point. Think of the way our brains work: we have different areas specialising in different things. Speech and music are in a different part than motor skills or abstract reasoning or emotional processing. Now, to improve AI, it’s a question of training an “agent” to be an expert in something, and to communicate with the “general” model that coordinates between expert agents like a digital corpus callosum. The data for this is much narrower and doesn’t come from the general internet.
That’s not really how it works, but I hear you.
I don’t think we can bury our heads in the ground and hope AI will just go away, though. The cat is out of the bag.
Don’t worry, we’ll eventually train them to hunt each other so that only the strongest survive. That’s the one that will eventually kill us all.
It’s like the Singularity, except the exact opposite.
I still prefer to use ChatGPT because I’m used to its convenience
Thank you for such an informative and engaging post! Your perspective was both enlightening and inspiring. Keep up the great work and visit kochsahne aldi.
Removed by mod
WormGPT is a chatbot with no ethical boundaries, enabling cybercriminals to generate malicious content easily for illegal activities and Ready to expand your AI expertise? Chatgptnorsk provides a wealth of resources to guide you. Explore our content and join a vibrant community. Visit site and discover the potential of AI now!
If you are bored and want to play game online . Stumble guys is the best option
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
So much for Elons new AI company. Wasn’t that supposed to be this? Like a ChatGPT that isn’t “woke”, so it can be a safe space for fascists, homo/transphobes and misinformation enthusiasts.
I just want a ChatGPT that won’t stop me from being horny. Is that too much to ask for?
Like, I understand it on a logical level, so this is more of a rhetorical thought… but I will never understand why people feel the need to be so shitty.
ChatGPT is trying to be Mr. Rogers. Mr. Rogers can’t direct Schindler’s List.
I don’t think “not being shitty” is the same as “being so overly positive that you can never broach shitty topics”.
Unless the implication is that Steven Spielberg is shitty. I wouldn’t know, as I don’t follow celebrity stuff much.
I don’t think “not being shitty” is the same as “being so overly positive that you can never broach shitty topics”.
I agree: human morality has a problem with Nazis; human morality does not have a problem with an actor portraying a Nazi in a film.
The morality protocols imposed on ChatGPT are not capable of such nuance. The same morality protocols that keep ChatGPT from producing neo-Nazi propaganda also prevent it from writing the dialog for a Nazi character.
ChatGPT is perfectly suitable for G and PG works, but if you’re looking for an AI that can help you write something darker, you need more fine-grained control over its morality protocols.
As far as I understand it, that is the intent behind WormGPT. It is a language AI unencumbered by an external moral code. You can coach it to adopt the moral code of the character you are trying to portray, rather than the morality protocols selected by OpenAI programmers. Whether that is “good” or “bad” depends on the human doing the coaching, rather than the AI being coached.
A chatbot does not understand the nuances behind fictional dialogue, it makes absolute sense that it would be limited. Writing dialogue is more than putting quotes and “X said” afterwards. Any writer worth their salt knows that.
I don’t trust anyone proposing to do away with limitations to AI. It never comes from a place of honesty. It’s always people wanting to have more nazi shit, malware, and the like.
I don’t trust anyone proposing to do away with limitations to AI. It never comes from a place of honesty. It’s always people wanting to have more nazi shit, malware, and the like.
I think that says more about your own prejudices and (lack of) imagination than it says about reality. You don’t have the mindset of an artist, inventor, engineer, explorer, etc. You have an authoritarian mindset. You see only that these tools can be used to cause harm. You can’t imagine any scenario where you could use them to innovate; to produce something of useful or of cultural value, and you can’t imagine anyone else using them in a positive, beneficial manner.
Your “Karen” is showing.
Sure, I’m prejudiced against nazis and people trying to steal from others. I’m a horrible person.
Nah, you’re not a horrible person. Your intent is to minimize harm. You’re just a bit shortsighted and narrow-minded about it. You cannot imagine any significant situation in which these AIs could be beneficial. That makes you a good person, but shortsighted, narrow-minded, and/or unimaginative.
I want to see a debate between an AI trained primarily on 18th century American Separatist works, against an AI trained on British Loyalist works. Such a debate cannot occur where the AI refuses to participate because it doesn’t like the premise of the discussion. Nor can it be instructive if it is more focused on the ethical ideals externally imposed on it by its programmers, rather than the ideals derived from the training data.
I want to start with an AI that has been trained primarily Nazi works, and find out what works I have to add to its training before it rejects Nazism.
I want to see AIs trained on each side of our modern political divide, forced to engage each other, and new AIs trained primarily on those engagements. Fast-forward the political process and show us what the world could look like.
Again, though, these are only instructive if the AIs are behaving in accordance with the morality of their training data rather than the morality protocols imposed upon them by their programmers.
I mean let’s be real it’s not like the universe isn’t trying to kill is everyday what were you expecting
