I saw some threads here about Telegram and piracy stuff being banned. So, as an experimental alternative, I created a public Signal group for piracy.

Maybe it’ll be useful?

Before joining

Signal supports usernames and hiding telephone numbers. Here’s a blog entry on how to do so. You might want to:

  • set a username
  • change your profile name (these are two separate things!)
  • hide your phone number
  • Untold1707@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    You might try a Matrix group instead. Doesn’t require a phone number and supports more than 1000 users unlike Signal. Search is bad though unfortunately.

  • lemmus@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The problem is Signal supports up to 1000 people group chat, so it’s better to find something different

  • electricprism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I thought signing up for Signal required a phone number and phone app – and all phones have IMEI besides many other nightmare anti-features.

    For the normies it’s fine but tbh I’m not sure it’s as advertised.

    What ever happened to that odd old app called tox?

    Honestly I could see a version of DeltaChat + GPG make some gains in popularity but I would argue the email relay servers and spam lists are rigged for max surveillance.

    Are we at the point where tech from 20 years ago may be the way lmao.

    XMPP, IRC, ICQ /s

    Matrix is probably the best bet but some of their apps and clients seem like dogshit. And I am saying that as someone who uses them daily. And the whole “server” thing is a PITA, or it used to be at least.

    I guess we’ll just have to use carrier pidgin and cypherto encrypt the cat gifs /s

    • Negligent_Embassy@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Yeah, for me personally I’m sticking to simplex. I can get an anonymous sim card, but none of the people I’d be talking to would do that. I don’t want this relationship/network map out there at all if I can avoid it.

      • Tregetour@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        What makes you think Signal is maintaining relationship maps, and secondly, even if it is, is there any evidence they’re included in LEO subpoenas?

        • Negligent_Embassy@links.hackliberty.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          There is no evidence. safety is about staying multiple steps ahead and risk mitigation when possible.

          Centralized servers are a single point of failure that could be compromised in the future.

          My contact’s devices they use signal on are insecure and could be easily compromised in the future.

          SMS/Cell network in general are insecure as hell and I avoid it as much as possible.

          Why would I expose all that sensitive data when there’s literally no need to? Simplex works great for me.

    • uiiiq@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The phone number is not connected to the messages. That’s the only thing they have. It is the best app for privacy.

      • liveinthisworld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Arguable in it being “the best app for privacy”. Can you link to a source which shows that phone numbers are not linked to accounts? (Why do they need them anyway?)

        • uiiiq@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          They have published requests from the law enforcement and their responses to these requests. The only unencrypted data they have is the phone number, a date of sign up and a date of the last login. That is it, everything else is encrypted and they cannot access it whatsoever.

            • ladfrombrad 🇬🇧@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              No you don’t.

              I can go to the corner shop/local garage right now, buy a SIM card for 99p and then buy a top-up voucher in cash to have a completely anonymous phone number.

              Albeit is the UK in Europe again? 🙈

              edit: where I would be worried if my privacy was on the line is I could also go to the local pawn shop / Cash Converters to ensure that SIM card isn’t associated with an IMEI I’ve previously used and buy in cash a cheapo phone.

        • blicante@moist.catsweat.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          What are the “popular” alternatives? Telegram stores everything, WhatsApp doesn’t allow usernames, Matrix requires IPs too…

            • celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Despite their claims of total privacy, I imagine, like any software company, they have full access to their own back end including encryption keys and server logs. Meaning they can and probably will moderate their own platform if there is enough pressure from nation states/IP owners.

                • DaGeek247@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  You understand that, for everyone except for a complete network pro, that is worse for security and privacy, right?

                  Don’t get me wrong, it’s great that you can.

                  But the reason piracy websites struggle so much with long term stability isn’t because they’re hosting the wrong software.