• d00ery@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    23 days ago

    Muskyness aside; it is pretty impressive to watch, almost looks like the footage has been reversed.

    Audio is really annoying.

    • SpacePirate@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      lol, how is the audio annoying? Those are literally the engineers who worked on this, one of the most difficult engineering problems in human history, having nailed it on their first try.

      If you want pure rocket audio, look into cosmic perspective after a few weeks.

        • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 days ago

          The first time they tried to catch with the chopsticks, it workes without blowing up the whole launchpad.

          When they did this with the Falcon 9, it took several flights to get a landing without significant damage to the drone ship, the booster, or both.

          Pretty impressive that they got it to work right out of the gate with the Super Heavy Booster

          • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            23 days ago

            It also proves the importance of progressive integration tests even if they’re destructive. The amount you can learn by actually putting everything together is just fundamentally necessary to make sure these complex systems work.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      Musk just owns the company, which sucks. There are clearly a lot of very talented people there who do actually work while Musk is in his K-hole.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      Well no dispite musk since he’s well publicized to be a hinderence aide from the money he provides.

      • ZMoney@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        Could you link a source? I just want to believe this; I’ve never actually seen evidence of it.

  • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    Indeed, it was insane! Super impressive that they got it on the first try.

    As an aside, I’m curious how you found the mp4 download link for a twitter video. Is there one for every video? Are they embeddable?

    Edit: It appears that they are embeddable!

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      Yeah, less weight without landing legs, plus faster turn around since it’s already were it needs to go.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      Seriously, there are no women in that entire crowd. Come to think of it they’re all white too.

      Well, I suppose it’s tradition.

      • MumboJumbo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        SpaceX is ran by a woman, Gwynne Shotwell. Musk is the CEO, but she runs the show as the COO - this is because of her.

      • Crampon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        You forgot to change user when replying to yourself?

        Dicks don’t launch rockets. Brains do. SpaceX has plenty of brains with, and without dicks attached.

        Stop being a salty shit.

      • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        The average percentage of women in aerospace is ~13.4%

        SpaceX has 14.1% female.

        NASA has 35.5% women.

        Boeing has 24.1% women.

        Virgin Galactic has 25% women.

        Blue Origin has 20% women.

        Lockheed has 32% female.

        Grumman has 24.5% female.

        Raytheon has 29% female.

        Maybe women in aerospace just don’t want to work for Musk?

        • Morphit @feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          Where are those numbers from? I don’t doubt them but it seems a bit weird that even the lowest outlier of these big aerospace companies is still above average for the industry. I guess this is just saying that smaller companies have even more difficulty hiring/retaining female workforce.