- cross-posted to:
- conservative@lemmy.world
- texas@lemmy.world
:focal(0x0:3000x2000)/static.texastribune.org/media/files/1d1a0ff6a64783a4c034c238e9b33bbc/Mifepristone%20REUTERS.jpg)
- cross-posted to:
- conservative@lemmy.world
- texas@lemmy.world
You must log in or register to comment.
The Gilead states don’t like it when other states have freedom. Gives their people ideas.
Does this mean that states like Illinois can sue states like Indiana for not doing anything about the steady stream of guns crossing the border or does it only apply to right wing policies?
Ask the US supreme court. But I think I can predict their answer.
History and tradition allow conservatively held states to fuck up liberal states. Unfortunately, the vice versa is not true.
Suck it.
- SCOTUS, but in lawyer speak and with 30 pages of nonsense justifications.
Alito will find a precenent in the ravings of some Witchsniffer Pursuivant who got rich burning women in Norwich in the 1600s.
“Violates interstate commerce, blah, blah…” Which the SCOTUS will ignore anyway.
A few years ago, I would have had some faith in the courts to follow the law. Now, not so much.
Honestly we are rapidly approaching the point where states are gonna have to raise militia just to stop other states from doing interstate raids. This is gonna rapidly spiral.
sTaTeS rIgHTs
Only applies when it comes to stomping on human rights.
States rights to what?
To provide medical services to those who seek it
