So this is some bollocks. Guess I’ll be cancelling our plan since it’s only used by two of us.

Current price $17.99/month, new price $32.99/month.

If they boiled the frog better I would probably have accepted a $5/month price rise, and then another later… But close to doubling in one go is a no from me dawg.

Thank you for being a loyal member throughout our journey. We created YouTube Premium so that you could enjoy all the videos and music you love without interruptions.‌

To continue delivering great service and features, we are increasing the YouTube Premium family plan price to A$32.99/month. We don’t make these decisions lightly, and this update will allow us to continue to improve YouTube Premium and support the creators and artists you watch on YouTube. This is the first ever price increase for your subscription.

Links to cancellation etc: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/12400348?sjid=6028684095030617608-AP

  • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Jesus, how do they justify that price?

    They charge more than Netflix yet they don’t even make any of their own content?

    • ChronosWing@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s because you also get youtube music streaming included with it. If netflix had its own music streaming service bundled in their prices would be even higher than they are now.

      • aksdb@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Music might really be their main problem. Basically every video has some music in it. If not in the foreground, then in the background. Even game soundtracks in Let’s Plays are often under license. So the moment someone plays any such video, the content mafia comes around the corner with their baseball bats in hand collecting their tolls.

        So I assume if they have to pay for music any way, they figured they might as well include a tailored music listening experience with Premium.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not apologizing for them: they’re assholes. But I expect they have more traffic. Still not saying they’re right.

  • bestusername@aussie.zoneM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Got the same bullshit email, total dick move by Google and I’ll be cancelling. It’s just pure greed.

    I’m be exploring the ad blocking and/or VPN options.

    Google need to separate YouTube and Music.

    • Salvo@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They want You to do everything Google. YouTube is the only thing that differentiates their All-in-One product from the competition. Everyone offers Music so VEVOs no value. Everything else Google offers for no monetary charge.

      AppleOne includes music, storage and AppleTV+, as well as Fitness (that nobody uses, but nobody admits to not using).

      Amazon Prime includes music, Audiobooks and Freight Discounts.

      Xbox Gold offers games.

      Netflix, HBO, etc, has no extra value except “original” and exclusive content.

    • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Google need to separate YouTube and Music.

      I actually think they need to go the other way with it. Increase the value proposition by adding more features to it. Include more drive space, Google one, etc.

      A lot of people are upset because they haven’t added any additional value to YouTube and are now just hiking the rents. If they threw in, more products and services to the bundle it’s a more compelling offering. I’d pay if it got me unlimited data on Google Fi, Google one with 200GB of storage, yt premium, I guess yt music? (I pay for prime music RN), and maybe some collab space/compute.

  • Why9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    $400 a year for YouTube premium.

    I’d gladly pay that much for a robust ad blocker!

    • Machinist3359@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      At this point, everyone should invest a fraction of that into automating youtube downloads. No ads, no buffering, and $200 will get you eniugh hard drive space for years.

  • No1@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Personally, I’m a fan of


    For those who must have the official paid version, keep an eye on Ozbargain Youtube.

    Free trials and/or VPN + subscribe overseas for a fraction of the price, eg Individual has been $2.34 a month via India, A$2.30 via Turkey

    (this is before any potential price increases in those countries)

  • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    1. selfhost jellyfin
    2. automatically download youtube videos based on a txt file with channel urls
    3. redirect youtube links to invidious for all other use case.
    4. never directly visit the youtube site ever again, depending on other service you use, no longer need a google account.
    5. no profit cause i never paid a dime but no regrets either.
    • ChuckEffingNorris@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have an android phone and an android TV so I see no ads. However I have an iPad which I take away and the ads make me sad.

      Is there any way to adblock YouTube on an iPad?

  • Yerbouti@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m always amaze by the fact that all these streaming platform do is give you access to others content ( they dont create shit), but they get to keep 98.7% of the revenue, because.

    • Palacegalleryratio [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      In this industry the “means of production” = “hosting and distribution platform and servers”. If you’ve got no way of hosting your content and putting it in front of people, your content may as well not exist. In much the same way an actor needs a theatre.

      So as per any capitalist industry, those that own the means of production (I.e. google with YouTube) exploit its workers (content creators) to generate profit in the same way a steel mill owner gets to keep the profits from his steel mill despite the fact that the owner never creates any steel ingots themselves.

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah people don’t notice that the Internet used to be like going over to a friend’s house who had the cool stuff which over time became niche shops.
        Rules, regulations and restrictions, slowly put up more and more stops for simple small people to enter the space and left only large companies in it’s place. Some of this by consumers own demand for more.

        So here we are, the Internet just the next space for capitalism and having every last scrap of revenue squeezed from it while those with capital complain they need the next big invention to exploit as they run out of space and room to grow and things to consume. Each day pushing more towards their pockets and less towards the rest of us.

        I just want small curators back. Small groups filling niches instead of massive “creators” who simply consume as much as possible to regurgitate it back at their audience.