Screenshot doesn’t even show half.

  • rotopenguin@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    On the plus side, snaps also crap your system log full of petty little AppArmor events. And when snap gets its permissions wrong, you can easily fix it with SnapSeal.

    (If Flatpak would just fucking stop rewriting every file path as /var/run/1000/blah, it would be the unquestionably superior package tech)

    • SirNuke@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Friction between Snap and AppArmor is to be expected. The corporate sponsor of Snap, Canonical, is well known for their icy relationship with the corporate sponsor of AppArmor, Canonical.

  • I_like_cats@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think Snap has the potential to be better than Flatpak. It’s a real sandbox instead of the half-assed shit Flatpak has going on. The problem I have with Snap is that Canonical keeps the Server closed-source. I don’t want a centralized app store where Canonical can just choose to remove apps they don’t like. So as long as the Server is closed-source, I will stay on Flatpak