From the article:

"I know for a fact that Wikipedia operates under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license, which explicitly states that if you’re going to use the data, you must give attribution. As far as search engines go, they can get away with it because linking back to a Wikipedia article on the same page as the search results is considered attribution.

But in the case of Brave, not only are they disregarding the license - they’re also charging money for the data and then giving third parties “rights” to that data."

  • Xæris@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    TIL; stay away from Brave.

    Not only because of this article, but merely an hour ago I have read also this post (numerous links provided in the post) about the dubious Brendan Eich.

    • Monologue@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      i don’t get why people choose to use brave, firefox is great and if you really need that chromium base ungoogled chromium exists

      • frequency@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think Brave did some aggressive marketing, including social media posts and comments. I did buy their narrative at first too - a browser that already tuned to block ads and trackers. But later I’ve noticed that it constantly connects back to brave server and it looked suspicious. Firefox is the best.

        • CrypticCoffee@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Agreed, a lot of Reddit comments felt very shilly. Firefox is king and helps prevent Google dictate web standards.

          • oblique_strategies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, exactly. If every browser is chromium based the web will be an unhealthy monoculture. Easy for a single player to dictate standards. Haven’t seen this mentioned as much, but its really important

        • azron@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Librewolf is starting to replace Firefox for me. Either way birds of a feather!

          • Jarmer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think LW is better out of the box. It has both UBO and Containers built in. Which is just awesome. I still use FF as my daily just because I have customized it beyond belief, but if I were to start over again I think I’d start with LW.

      • Matt@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Brave is great for less techy people because it’s defaults are good enough. It’s not necessary to tweak settings and install add-ons to get basic privacy. I definitely prefer Firefox, but it takes some knowledge to get it to surpass Brave’s defaults.

          • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Add-ons give you a lot more choice and control than baked in options.

            What’s stopping Brave’s blocker from just allowing ads from Brave’s services? Can you see under the hood to tell if it’s blocking everything or just surface level stuff?

            A proprietary built in blocker is only as trustworthy as the people that made it, and as the links in this discussion suggest, Brave isn’t earning much trust.

      • Xæris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can try Librewolf. It is a firefox fork with focus on privacy. You do not need to go through many settings when setting it up, as you need to do with firefox standalone.

  • RustyOperator@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d like to shout out Mull (Firefox based) and Mulch (Chrome based) web browsers. They are basically more secure and private versions of those app and they maintained by the devs of DivestOS which is the privacy Android OS that is recommended for devices that aren’t Pixels.

  • DeadGemini@waveform.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    tsk tsk tsk. When will people learn to just use Firefox or Librewolf? Do you want a web browser, or an AI training crypto wallet?

    • zingo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I read ya.

      I was always skeptical about Brave with their side projects of crypto etc. Its funny because privacytools.io recommends them till this day.

      I have been using Librewolf for some time now and I am happy with it.

        • Solar Bear@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Brave still is a great browser just disable a few settings as recommended in the guide

          Brave is still Chromium in a new coat of paint and you’re still aiding Google in their domination of web standards.

  • Poob@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well fuck, what am I supposed to use? I use bitwarden for passwords, so that shit works everywhere, but I want a mobile browser and a desktop browser that share history. Being able to share tabs between devices is a nice bonus.

    Firefox on mobile is hot garbage with infuriating UI bugs. I keep trying to switch to it, and keep switching away after a few days.

    I’m sure as shit not going to Chrome.

    • steal_your_face@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I use Firefox on iOS and grapheneOS and it works fine. UI is not as nice as others but it works. Never seen bugs personally ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    • Leraje@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah and I expect it from those companies. I guess I was naive enough to think Brave would be better than this.

      But then I didn’t know about Eich’s homophobia, antivaxx beliefs and basic awfulness either (as mentioned in the link u/Xaeris mentions.)

      • jacktherippah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago
        • On Android, Firefox lacks per-site process isolation, which makes it less secure than Chromium browsers (not insecure, just less secure.)
        • With privacy.resistFingerprinting on, Firefox on Android is stuck at 60hz, which I don’t like.
        • There is a noticeable difference in performance between Firefox and Chromium. Firefox is consistently slower when loading webpages, which you notice after using Chromium.

        Don’t get me wrong, I like Firefox. I use LibreWolf on desktop. I just can’t justify using it on Android, at least not yet. Guess I’ll go back to using Vanadium.

          • jacktherippah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            This might not matter to 60hz users but to the ones used to 120hz, it is jarring to go back to 60hz. Everything feels a split second slower and animations look pretty choppy.

            • Cauê@lemmy.eco.br
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Maybe I am too old, I never see any difference. Also IIRC I read once our eyes/brain/wahtever can’t tell the difference anyway. Guess I was wrong.