Shipping tycoon Angela Chao was drunk when she inadvertently reversed her Tesla into a pond and drowned last month at a Texas ranch, police say.

Blanco County Sheriff’s Office found her blood alcohol level was nearly three times the state’s legal limit.

The 50-year-old died after dinner on 10 February with a group of friends at the estate near Johnson City.

Her brother-in-law, Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, cited the tragedy in his resignation speech.

On Wednesday, Blanco County Sheriff’s Office released the findings of its investigation concluding Ms Chao’s death was an “unfortunate accident”.

  • unmagical@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Of course she was. Putting your car into reverse and letting it back fully into a pond without braking when you actually meant to put it in drive is not something an unimpaired driver does.

    • gregorum@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      9 months ago

      Don’t be so sure. I have seen people, rarely, actually be that incredibly stupid.

      But, yes, it most often means they are impaired.

        • skeptomatic@lemmy.ca
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          If Celsius, then yes.
          Oh, and if Fahrenheit, then maybe.
          If Kelvin, lend me your DeLorean time machine.

        • gregorum@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          If that were the case, then we wouldn’t have global warming problem anymore.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Eh, not defending a drunk driver but there’s more to this:

      • the Tesla gear interface is a touchscreen where there’s no “feel” for which gear you’ve selected if you fatfinger it.
      • many folks, sober or drunk, when they get the car moving in an unexpected way reflexively stamp down on the pedal their foot is currently on. This could happen to you. You are not immune.

      So if you are in the wrong gear, then panic stomp the pedal, you can absolutely find yourself speeding in the wrong direction.

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        the Tesla gear interface is a touchscreen

        Because of course it is… Jesus fucking Christ, of all the things to remove all tactile feedback from…

      • pipe01@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        IIRC you have to swipe the whole screen to change into reverse, so you can’t really do it accidentally

    • gnate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The gear selection method in those is non-intuitive. Doesn’t alter your conclusions, just an unfortunate and unsafe design choice.

      Edit: replaced wrong words

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Adrenaline does weird things to your brain, when controlling a car. When startled, we default to getting low and stable. That’s good when standing, however, it putting your feet flat on the ground is extremely bad when in the driver’s seat.

      I’ve actually witnessed this in action. A slip resulted in 2 cars written off, 1 pushed through several gardens. I can easily see someone doing something similar, with a Tesla. Alcohol would just amplify the effect.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I don’t drink, but I realize that getting home after one has been drinking is a legitimate problem that does encourage people to drive drunk.

      It’s one thing that I hope that self-driving cars will help address in the long run. If everyone’s got their own electronic chauffeur readily available, it’s lot easier to let them get one home safely.

      • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        9 months ago

        FYI there’s already a solution: Public transit. I understand the US doesn’t have it but the solution already exists.

      • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I’ve been saying my next car will have FSD for… almost a decade now. I have lost hope that what you describe will be a reality for me anytime soon, and with the progress of self-driving in general? Very. Little. Hope.

  • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    She was already in the “probably had it coming” category but this just makes it moreso.

    Drinking and driving is the same as making a decision to maim or murder others, in my opinion.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    A funny part of this whole thing that isn’t discussed… Why isn’t the “intelligent robot car” equipped with anything to stop you from doing any of the shit that led to this? Fucking snake oil bullshit.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      You really don’t want an automated system to have complete, unbreakable control over a scenario. You always want the option for a human to manually take control, because automation isn’t foolproof, especially in edge cases.

      However, they probably should have a breathalyzer that prevents you from taking manual control if you’re so impaired that the automated system is probably safer than your drunken judgement.

      • Snapz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        You’re missing the point, I didn’t say full autonomous control. There are thousands of intermediate steps that could be involved - from escalating light/audio warnings, to auto lowering of the Windows or popping doors slightly to relieve pressure when significant water is sensed within car’s internals for a sustained period of time to maybe even a temp limit of a vehicle speed/control while it’s moving under a certain speed towards a sensed danger and not on a road/highway.

        The bigger point is that musk snake oil cars are sold with the vapor of “smart” and this did nothing smart to help save this woman’s life, in fact it sealed her into her avoidable death due to poor design and profound lack of several basic and easy to implement potential “smart” features that could have attempted to warn or intervene.

  • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    How can you be a billionaire CEO and don’t have a driver? The CEO of a company I used to work for, cannot contractually drive by itself and had a couple of drivers 24/7 working for him, and he didn’t even was a billionaire.

    • somethingchameleon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Err… her kids are just going to inherit that wealth.

      This solves nothing and you shouldn’t think it does.

      The only way to get rid of the ruling class is to redistribute their wealth. Any other suggestion is just a distraction for useful idiots.

  • thesmokingman@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    What about a death from a drunk driver is an “unfortunate accident?” It’s not an accident, first of all, because you have to intentionally choose to break the law and operate heavy machinery while blitzed. Second of all it’s not unfortunate it’s fucking preventable because you have to intentionally choose to the break the law and operate heavy machinery while sloshed. I’d even go so far as to say it was fortunate because the drunk driver killed themself instead of someone else which a huge consequence that has led to it being against the law to operate heavy machinery while fucking hammered.

    “Gee we’re sorry this person did the thing we tell you not to do from before you start driving it’s so unfortunate they made an intentional choice to endanger the life of anyone around them including themself this very bad decision we tell you not to make was clearly an accident”

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I mean, it’s definitely still an accident. Getting behind the wheel wasn’t an accident, and obviously she shouldn’t have done it, but reversing into a body of water and drowning to death wasn’t an intentional act. Don’t be absurd.