• TheGoldenPineapples@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just don’t really get the consistency here.

    I personally have no issue with VAR not being able to rule that the ball went out of play. I think Gabriel was fouled in the build-up and I still don’t see how they didn’t have the correct footage for the offside, but that’s another matter entirely.

    My point is that if there wasn’t enough evidence to rule out whether or not Willock had run the ball out for them to act, then why was Rashford keeping the ball in play against Brighton not given the same advantage? Surely, they had the same level of evidence for that, no?

    • Jamesy555@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They didn’t actually, there was a camera level with the line rather than at an off angle

    • kdpilarski@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They had a camera view level with the goal line for the rashford goal, which they didn’t for this one.

    • NUFC9RW@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They had a better angle on that one they judged to be sufficient evidence to rule that out.

  • wheeno@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are they actually an independent panel. I get why technically they could be “independent” but aren’t they all just former refs and pgmol members?

    If that’s not a foul, every single game from now on Arsenal should just start by floating crosses to the back post and blatantly push defenders down. There’s no need to be sly about it, make it the most obvious pushes.

  • kwhicks@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not mention of callum Wilson choking Gabriel and assaulting him? Even when they try to correct themselves, laughable

  • EducationalTension72@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Players see a red , miss three matches, Few more yellows, miss a match, easy touch Wrong call? Ohh human error darling. Blunder? Apologies maybe? 😳👉🏻👈🏻

  • Ajax_Trees_Again@alien.top
    cake
    B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m in awe people are still crying about this. The Liverpool decision last night was worse and the man United decision was about on par and everyone has moved on.

    • Whitehaven@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Arsenal have the most batshit conspiracy theory crazy fanbase on the internet, they are either 10yr olds or have the mental capacity of 10yr olds. it’s hilarious how triggered they got over a correct decision this week. They’ve become the new banter FC, been some incredible takes. Been fun to watch the state of some of it

    • teamorange3@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Arsenal fans are the softest fan base in all of football. I honestly don’t get how they watch the game and find enjoyment out of it.

    • Thanos_Stomps@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Man I am crying about all of it. I don’t care if it was UEFA, the Rashford Red Card was fucking atrocious. I didn’t see the Liverpool call but I also cried about the abysmal communication that disallowed Liverpool’s goal against Tottenham too. And I will cry when any team is fucked over by the refs. Refs are making headlines more than players are, and that is a problem.

    • spurssy@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right?

      Like this doesn’t even rate in the top 5 most atrocious games for reffing this season.

    • Olliewombat@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      True, because other decisions were worse we should ignore all other injustices. We should also just move on and then complain about the same stuff next week when more bad decisions happen. Nothings going to change if people don’t keep talking about it.

    • Wide_Challenge3880@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      For me, I think it’s because people can’t even admit that Arsenal got fucked over that match. There are still people who think the goal was fair.

      Then there’s stories of PGMOL making sure pundits cover the referees

      • 93EXCivic@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If Harvetz is sent off like he should of been either for the tackle they reviewed or the other late tackle that should have been a second yellow, then the game is probably very different.

    • Calergero@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it’s the fact that there are 3 controversial incidents in one game and within one of those incidents 3 controversial calls were made.

      Add to that the aggrieved parties manager called out the refereeing organisation.

    • milkonyourmustache@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s being reposted by a United fan, only difference is this is now in a neat little graphic instead of the full report.

  • ModeTop7@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would love to see what evidence they had to disallow the goal that Rashford apparently let the ball go out of play for. Different rules for different clubs apparently.

  • Drj1001@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Joelinton has two stretched arms in the back of Gabriel, how is that not a freekick?! 👀

    • Bendy_McBendyThumb@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Probably because, just as football fans rage over other VAR decisions showing refs just the still image, a still image doesn’t show enough evidence. Go back slightly from the where the still image is, you’ll see Gabriel jumps upward slightly, before then flopping himself.

      I don’t mind getting downvoted into oblivion by fans who disagree with this, but go take a careful look for yourself, without bias, and you’ll see Joelinton doesn’t impede Gabriel, and Gabriel’s movement is inconsistent with if he’d been pushed, hence he can’t have been pushed.

  • 21otiriK@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Bruno incident probably doesn’t even happen if Havertz gets correctly sent off. He’d completely lost his head in the aftermath to that and half-time came at a good time for him.

  • National-Fig4803@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Funny that. They decide that the match defining call was correct but happy to hold their hands up to the other two.

    It was a foul for the goal. It’s fucking simple. Cowards.

  • chariot_dota@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    ??? why always the first image that is shown in havertz tackle? That leg doesn’t even catch anyone