• FarFarAway@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They lured people into spending money on getting awards. Now they are not only removing the award system, but going back and retroactively removing awards that have already been given out, effectively taking peoples money and not providing the service that the money paid for.

      • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        People spending money on something worthless and that’s what they got.

        The terms were clear that these worthless awards were temporary by nature to begin with. There’s no argument for fraud, and I’m sure Reddit has a competent legal department.

        (Civil) Legality aside. The remorse these buyers feel is healthy, imo.

        Anyhow, fuck Reddit.

  • SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It is quite crazy. People will have time until Sept. 12 to spend their coins on awards … and then Reddit will delete all gilded awards from every post. WTF? Why even use them at all from now on?

    This thing reeks of control. Reddit is trying to prohibit people from giving undesired opinions more visibility. In the past sometimes comments received awards that were not in line with advertisers. Now by removing this feature, these comments can only receive an up- or downvote but do not stand out by gilded awards anymore. And the up- and downvote is something that can easily be twiddled with behind the scenes to the desired outcome. It was much harder to remove awards from a comment, as the person who gave them out, would recognize it immediately. But who can proof that their up/downvote was not counted correctly… it is the perfect manipulation.

    See also: Guided democracy

    In a guided democracy, the government controls elections such that the people can exercise democratic rights without truly changing public policy. While they follow basic democratic principles, there can be major deviations towards authoritarianism. Under managed democracy, the state’s continuous use of propaganda techniques prevents the electorate from having a significant impact on policy.[3] It is today widely employed in Russia, where it was introduced into common practice by Kremlin theorists, in particular Gleb Pavlovsky.

    • AToM.exe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes, it’s definitely a tool of control. They can now basically choose what opinion they want to have visible on their site.

      Also with the history of u/spez changing users comments, I wouldn’t be surprised if the upvotes can’t be trusted.

      Give it a couple of month and this site will be run by 80% bots and advertisers.

      • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It makes me wonder how long (not even “if”) they have been artificially manipulating post/comment scores of submissions they have a vested interest in.

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Like many places this will probably get your account banned. Which at this point, good?

      • Cinner@lemmy.worldB
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Except that many large companies share large payment processors, and too many chargebacks (keep in mind “too many” is not a set number, it’s a changing variable depending on many factors) can get you banned from the using the entire payment processor and any companies that use them.