Looks like the ship got farther this time. Still, not a complete success

  • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think we may be measuring success very differently here. I’m not measuring it by how much money a billionaire can save, I’m measuring it via practical positive results for humanity. A billionaire vanity project is hardly going to benefit the rest of us, especially when all their progress is patented and others are prevented from using the same designs. Flights to the ISS still use old surplus Soviet rockets. Rockets designed decades ago. If SpaceX is at the forefront of humanity’s space exploration, why are they lagging behind things we’ve already managed to achieve decades ago?

    Don’t fall for the techbro hype and spin around Musk. SpaceX is not doing anything other than privatising space travel and ensuring it is only accessible to the wealthiest of the wealthy. And it is doing it on the taxpayer’s dime, but with none of the benefits to the taxpayer that programs like NASA provide.

    EDIT: Oh shit, I challenged the word of our Lord and Saviour Elon Musk, and in my folly have summoned the techbros.

    • comradecalzone@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Playing devil’s advocate - it looks like the main advancement made by SpaceX is the reusable rockets. Do you think this has a material benefit to space travel going forward?

      In terms of the real economy, I would think this is beneficial.

      Devil advocacy aside, I’m skeptical that reusable rockets should take priority over other possible areas of advancement; and of course, the inefficiencies and waste of the private sector should go without saying.

      • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It certainly has potential, but again, reusable rockets aren’t an entirely new concept either (look at the space shuttle for example). My main problem is that they patent their designs, so any successes they have don’t benefit humanity, they only benefit SpaceX’s stockholders.

    • SourCape@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      You don’t know what you’re talking about. SpaceX has been supplying the ISS for a decade, as well as bringing humans to the ISS. You want to talk about wasting taxpayer money, well that’s a hell of a lot cheaper than sending them to Kazakhstan.

      Sad to see the support you’re getting here. I’m no Musk fanboy but I am a SpaceX fan and we can’t deny the achievements they’ve made.

    • Wanderer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Lol you need to look up who supplies the ISS.

      Not to diminish how great Soyuz has been. But it’s day is almost done.

      Edit:tech boys understand tech instead of making things up. Who would have thought?

    • Taringano@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lol. So much effort to disregard an effort that’s clearly leading the technology just because it has a billionaire associated with it.

      If it helps you cope, musk wasn’t even close to a billionaire when they started SpaceX. There are thousands of the best workers in the industry working at SpaceX.