• TempleSquare@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Meanwhile, I’m laughing all the way to the bank with my Brother color laser.

    Yes, the printer didn’t have a low subsidized price up front. But now I can enjoy big toner cartridges that seem to last forever. And I can use all the knockoff ones I want. And the printer itself is bulletproof.

    Huge fan of Brother!

    • vanderbilt@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      We actually moved to using Brother lasers after dealing with HP’s anti-consumer nonsense one too many times. They started to refuse to distribute offline capable installers for their drivers, so we returned the rest of our stock and swore them off.

    • deadcream@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, the printer didn’t have a low subsidized price up front.

      This is brought up in every thread about printers by vigilant Brother customers roaming the internet spreading the gospel. Is there is actually any proof that HP prices are subsidized? What’s to stop them from having regular margins AND subscriptions (like everyone does these days) while Brother gets away with inflated margins claiming that others are selling below cost? This way both HP and Brother win.

      I don’t like HP either but I find ot a bit suspicious how every time Brother is mentioned its always with the remark about how their prices are totally ok.

      • Trapping5341@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t own a printer but to me does it really matter which way it’s going?

        HP printer: $50 Brother printer: $150 HP ink: $40 Brother ink: $20

        If the brother is cheaper to run daily. Then eventually assuming the same lifespan for both the brother will be cheaper in the end.

        I made up random number for my point I have no idea how much any of this actually costs so I could be way off base.

  • FinalBoy1975@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wanna know: Where is the better business bureau? Do they do any actual work to protect consumers from these shady business practices? Where’s the legislation to protect consumers from this bullshit? The better business bureau isn’t very useful. This type of stuff should be illegal.

    • potustheplant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You do understand what Instant Ink is, right? You’re not buying cartridges, you’re buying how many pages you can print. If you cancel your subscription and run out of pages to print, it no longer lets you print anything. Call me crazy but that makes sense.

      This is pretty awful in the sense that it generates waste but it’s also necessary for people not to abuse the system. Think about it like this, I buy 1 month of the cheapest plan, it costs me less than 1 cartridge and 1 cartridge can print more than the maximum amount of pages of my plan, I cancel said plan and keep using cartridge. Do you see how you could “game” the system to buy insanely cheap cartridges?

      There’s probably a better solution though. For example, they could try to come up with a way to identify people and/or printers used in the way I described before and prevent them from signing up to the service again.

      • FinalBoy1975@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I know a better solution! Just don’t have this kind of subscription! It’s wasteful, takes advantage of consumers, and it’s difficult to understand. It’s totally inappropriate to sell a printer to someone and limit / control their use of it with a subscription. The world of printing at home with HP needs a reboot, restarting again from: buy the printer and the supplies for it, print the things. This is why I’ve been using printers that are not HP since forever. In the old days, HP ink was the most expensive to buy but the printers were very cheap, the cheapest you could find at any store. This company has spent decades and decades controlling the ink and trying to get people to pay for the ink. It all started with being the cheapest printer at the store and being the most expensive ink at the store. 30 years or so later (plus or minus) we have this insanity. I like my setup for home printing. My printer, my ink, my paper. I print all I want.

        • potustheplant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s optional. If you don’t like it, don’t buy it. You can’t complain because the service works as described.

          IMO this subscription model only makes sense if you have a business and print a lot of pages per month. For a normal user it doesn’t make much sense.

      • WhoRoger@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Stop with this bullshit. This is exactly the kind of bullshit subscriptions this community is against.

  • MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Wait…you guys still use cartridges? We’ve had an Epson ET-4550. No cartridges. No subscription.

      • MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Have they moved away from cartridges to ink tanks? We buy bottles of ink for our printer that last for a long time.

        • Sendbeer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’re probably talking about laser printers. So technically cartridge I guess, but the toner lasts so long it’s pretty affordable.

          The ink tank printers sound interesting, but I don’t print very often. Do the heads still dry out on them?

  • Soyaro@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Funny how different the same company can appear to different people. My current printer from HP (maybe 2 or 3 years old) is the best I ever had. Sure, it offered a subscription for the ink, but after a quick calculation I knew that I would waste my money with that so I chose not to sign it. And now I have the first printer I’ve ever seen that answers “I don’t care about yellow, the text is blank and white” with “okay” and starting to print.

    • emberwit@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And that is not even something positive, just not a negative thing. Thats what should still be treated as the default behaviour.

  • Crunkle_Foreskin@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh yeah, this is awful.

    I recently bought a new printer, and getting something like an HP set up on Linux was a heart-breaking experience.

    It’d be really nice to have a Kickstarter for an “open-source” printer, where cartridge standards can be produced and you can buy them and use them freely.

  • Savas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bought a cheap HP printer about 10 years ago, max usage is maybe 50 prints a month, most months maybe less than 10, most times 0. Sits there and indeed it’s bloaty software is the most painful.