mox@lemmy.sdf.org to News@lemmy.world · 3 months agoUS Considers a Rare Antitrust Move: Breaking Up Googlewww.bloomberg.comexternal-linkmessage-square105fedilinkarrow-up1626arrow-down18file-textcross-posted to: singularity@lemmit.onlinetechnology@lemmit.online
arrow-up1618arrow-down1external-linkUS Considers a Rare Antitrust Move: Breaking Up Googlewww.bloomberg.commox@lemmy.sdf.org to News@lemmy.world · 3 months agomessage-square105fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: singularity@lemmit.onlinetechnology@lemmit.online
minus-squareZoboomafoo@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·3 months ago any source on him actively backing her Yes, she’s his subordinate
minus-squareViking_Hippie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·3 months agoThat’s not actively backing her. You have a very distorted view of the relationship between a boss and an employee. Hiring her for a job she’s qualified for on the advice of others and then not firing her is a passive lack of opposition at best, NOT active support.
Yes, she’s his subordinate
That’s not actively backing her. You have a very distorted view of the relationship between a boss and an employee.
Hiring her for a job she’s qualified for on the advice of others and then not firing her is a passive lack of opposition at best, NOT active support.