• 0x815@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    That’s a shame for Sweden. Unfortunately, we see similar things in many other countries, and not only regarding bears.

    • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 months ago

      You do know that (alpha) predator populations are self-regulating?

      More predators => less prey => fewer predators => more prey => more predators

      • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is a fact that every hunter wants to ignore, yet that justification always comes up when [insert any animal] is killed.

        • xenspidey@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          So starvation to control the population instead of hunting, got ya. What if the predators prey is plants? More predators => less plants => less predators => more plants?

          • gigachad@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Not sure if you are serious here. The definition of predation is killing and eating other animals. An organism eating plants is prey and its population gets controlled by predation.

            • xenspidey@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              My point here was for deer, deer in much of the US have no more natural predators. Hunters help fill that roll or else it’s disease, starvation, and cars that fill it.

          • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            So starvation to control the population instead of hunting, got ya.

            A.K.A. The way nature works… for hundreds of millions of years? Yes. Exactly that.

            If the carrying capacity of an ecosystem can’t support more predators, you don’t get more predators. The balance that nature has perfected always seems to be disrupted by humans looking to “control the population”.

            What if the predators prey is plants? More predators => less plants => less predators => more plants?

            Again, a balance that simply works without us interfering. When animals (and plants) are left to their own devices, they thrive. The only time this doesn’t happen is when humans get in the way.

            • xenspidey@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Right, deer in the populated areas of north America have no preditors any more. So that population needs to be controlled. In the city and county i live in there are bow hunting programs in the parks since there aren’t many places you could hunt otherwise. If not disease and cars are what would control it. Thats led then ideal. Plus if you don’t want the meat there are programs to donate it to shelters.

            • shalafi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              2 months ago

              when humans get in the way

              And that’s rather the problem with predator populations, isn’t it? You understand all of this, yet still think hunters are using false justifications?

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          It’s very much a relevant fact, especially in areas where natural predators have been eradicated either through habitat loss, or intentional hunting before we had conservation efforts in place. A wildlife manager considers every variable before determining how many hunting licenses are issued for the good of the ecology. Every hunter understands the balance, and the factors that determine a unit’s carrying capacity, it’s part of the mandatory hunter safety course training.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Oh bull, humans have severely beaten natural predators and prey has exploded. And over population is bad news for any species; over feeding, disease, etc. I’ve seen deer populations that were staggering in size, no idea their fate, but it can’t be good.

          Don’t want hunters? Fine, I’ve never hunted either, don’t care to. Reintroduce predators, so if you can make that happen. Farmers in Colorado shit kittens when the state reintroduced wolves.

          Ever seen a panther in your neck of the woods? I have, and despite being armed, I wouldn’t fancy my chances. (And thank god, we ended up ignoring one another.) Maybe we could get some more of those? I’d be all for it.

          Ever had a black bear in your house? I have. Love those guys, and they’re mostly harmless to humans. Given that people around here are used to them, they still flip when one hops the fence or dumps their garbage.

          Consider that those two animals are absolutely illegal to kill except in self-defense. Think Bubba doesn’t smoke 'em on site anyway? Because Bubba do that.

          So how well do you think reintroduction of predators would work?

          • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            Oh bull, humans have severely beaten natural predators and prey has exploded.

            That proves my point, though.

            And over population is bad news for any species; over feeding, disease, etc. I’ve seen deer populations that were staggering in size, no idea their fate, but it can’t be good.

            To clarify, overpopulation can be a thing, but mostly because of human activity and our own perspectives.

            Normally, the carrying capacity of any ecosystem has limits, and once the population of a certain species reaches that limit, there can be no more growth.

            When we leave predators alone, there are ups and down of both prey and predator populations. Totally normal, and totally expected. There’s NOTHING wrong with this.

            But when humans interfere, either directly (i.e. hunting) or indirectly (i.e. urban sprawl), it changes the dynamic of that ecosystem, and we notice or experience more conflicts.

            The problem with hunting and mass culling, is that it creates side effects, and hunters will be chasing their own tail (no pun intended) going after “problem animals”.

            Don’t want hunters? Fine, I’ve never hunted either, don’t care to. Reintroduce predators, so if you can make that happen. Farmers in Colorado shit kittens when the state reintroduced wolves.

            You’d be surprised how many farmers will purposely bait predatory species just so they can have an excuse to eradicate them. Very few actually take steps to avoid conflicts with those animals, but there are non-profit groups who can help them develop a plan.

            How do I know this? My wife spend nearly two decades in wildlife conservation, conflict avoidance (directly working with farmers), and wildlife rehabilitation. You should hear the stories!

            Ever seen a panther in your neck of the woods? I have, and despite being armed, I wouldn’t fancy my chances. (And thank god, we ended up ignoring one another.) Maybe we could get some more of those? I’d be all for it. Ever had a black bear in your house? I have. Love those guys, and they’re mostly harmless to humans. Given that people around here are used to them, they still flip when one hops the fence or dumps their garbage.

            These aren’t examples to justify hunting. If your home has been developed in proximity to where these large animals naturally live, what do you expect?

            If you do find a bear in your neighbourhood, the question that should be asked is, “who is leaving food out for them?”, not “do we have permission to kill them all?!!!”

            We have coyote around here. They are harmless, more so than the off leash dogs you see running around near kids. Yet there’s an obsession for people to want to kill every one they see. Did I mention our rabbit population has exploded as a result? I guess it’s time to kill all the rabbits! /s

            So how well do you think reintroduction of predators would work?

            Incredibly well.

            The trick is that humans need to be as hand’s off as possible. And when that happens, nature thrives.

    • BakedGoods@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s our hillbilly population unfortunately. Since they got access to the internet they’ve been getting way dumber and started voting for the nazi party. Then there’s the Sami of course. They mostly roleplay as some kind of “Indigenous” population while actually just being responsible for wiping out most wildlife for the last millennia. They always throw a tantrum over not being allowed to kill off all predators so they can fill every single square meter of northern Sweden with raindeer.

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The Sami are absolutely indigenous to upper Sweden though.

        Sweden has done some pretty terrible stuff to them in the past.

        I have a feeling you are part of the group that votes for SD or as you call them “the nazi” party.

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          except that most sami people these days are about as indigenous as an englishman with a welsh grandfather

          • lud@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            That seems like a good thing when the alternative is inbreeding since there are very few of them.