I never understood the benefit of public museums, especially in the internet age.
If you want to look at some artifacts without touching it, you could google it and see it.
Also in public museums a lot of artifacts get damaged due to visitors behaviors.
Wouldn’t it make more sense to keep the old artifacts at storage facility and release a high quality pictures of it instead of putting it in a museum?
Is there is a benefit for public museums?
This isn’t a thing.
Oh my god, you sweet, Summer child…
https://news.artnet.com/art-world/visitor-damages-chinese-bronze-minneapolis-institute-of-art-2298006
https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/antonio-canova-sculpture-damaged-italy-1202696024/
https://community.aam-us.org/communities/community-home/digestviewer/viewthread?GroupId=31&MessageKey=46bdaf23-5c26-45f9-a395-4dfa7efb5d05&CommunityKey=d34b2dfb-4151-4629-a59a-553d0ae428d9&hlmlt=VT
https://mauramcgurk.com/blog/365-days-art-january-22-museum-visitor-accidentally-damages-picasso/
https://www.nytimes.com/1990/04/07/arts/museum-visitor-damages-a-rembrandt.html
https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/us-tourist-damages-statues-in-israel-museum-due-to-religious-offence-4459268
https://time.com/4858769/selfie-museum-damage/
Now how many exhibits are there? Examples of damage would be 0.0001% at most, so not a thing.