• affiliate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    it’s interesting to see the summaries become more inaccurate and incendiary as you change the “bias” from left to right.

    left wing summary:

    • The 4B movement began in South Korea in 2019, advocating against heterosexual marriage, childbirth, dating, and sexual relationships with men.
    • Supporters aim to boycott a system they believe promotes gender inequity, seeking control over their lives.
    • The movement’s potential expansion to the U.S. Is seen as a response to perceived threats to women’s rights following an election.

    right wing summary:

    • A group of American liberal women launched the “4B Movement” to boycott relationships with men who voted for Donald Trump in the 2020 election.
    • The movement is a protest against perceived threats to women’s rights, including concerns about abortion rights and gender equality.
    • The effectiveness of the “4B Movement” in causing political change is currently uncertain, as it primarily aims to make a statement.

    notice how the left wing summary properly states that this is a movement that started years ago in korea, and that it’s something that women in the US are adopting due to the recent election. meanwhile, the right wing summary falsely claims that the movement was created by “American liberal women”. it also claims that the movement was created to “boycott relationships with men who voted for Donald Trump”, which is just not true from the other things i’ve read. everything else seems to indicate that the 4B movement is about boycotting relationships with all men, not just trump supporters. but maybe i’m wrong about that last point.

    • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      See that’s wild to me. If women ended relationships with Trump supporters that would be quite a statement.

      However it’s mostly left leaning women joining 4b. 52% of white women voted for Trump, even more when you include those who stayed home. That means more conservative relationships, marriages, families and fewer leftist ones. It’s almost what conservatives want with all that pureblood talk that the non pure bloods stop reproducing.

      Whatever at least it’s bringing attention to the cause for now so that’s worth something.

    • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The 4B movement could be considered a type of genocide actually, I’m surprised Rs aren’t getting upset about that (and I 100% support our right to genocide them back by using our rights to our own bodies)

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      The fact that neither side even breathes the word Lysistrata explains a lot about how you got there

      • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        i can forgive people for not referencing an ancient comedy that would take an entire paragraph of preamble to explain its relevant before making a point about a fictional story from a long time ago.

        it’s not like it was a history.

        • Taleya@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          “In a move straight out of lysistrata, an ancient greek comedy where women withold sexual favours to stop a war”

          I literally read that shit as part of a three month subject in year nine

            • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              It sets a context for people unfamiliar with 4B.

              Most people outside of Korea won’t be familiar with its internal politics, but anyone with the most basic education will know what Lysistrata is about.

              • affiliate@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 month ago

                i consider myself to have at least a basic level of education, and this was my first time hearing about Lysistrata

          • dontgooglefinderscult@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah we talking about America though. From experience we spend more time on our own states history than the entirety of Greece and Rome, except in relation to why so much Greco-Roman shit is in our country. I’m pretty sure we didn’t cover any Greek comedies.

            You don’t need to know any of that nonsense to be a good little patriotic non unionized factory worker.

        • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          an ancient comedy that would take an entire paragraph of preamble to explain

          It shouldn’t need explaining, though.

          It’s basic common knowledge that anyone with the slightest interest in not being ignorant should have been familiar with by the time they finished general education.

          (You don’t need to have watched or read the play, mind, that might be out of your control depending on its availability in your context, but there’s no excuse for not knowing it exists and what it’s about.)