• otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    It reduces the onus on businesses and places it on the government (and this indirectly, taxpayers).

    Better for small businesses to hire and thrive.

    “But I don’t want my taxes to go up!”

    Maybe you just need more tax brackets. Where I live, for some reason, a specialized doctor making $250,000/yr is in the same tax bracket as some C-suit making $900,000.

    I definitely need more tax brackets where I live.

    • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      Never understood the idea of tax brackets. Why isn’t it just continuous? Computers are calculating the tax now anyway, not like it would be infeasible.

      • vin@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        Could totally do a sigmoid function and just integrate over the income. But the brackets are just discrete approximation of that.

      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        Tax brackets are there for progressive taxation. Progressive income taxation is the most fair form of taxation. The least fair is consumption tax - such as sales tax. Sales tax tax disproportionately burdens lower income households. Since most places have sales tax, an aggressive progression of income taxation is called for to balance the scales.

        • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          I’m not speaking against progressive taxation, I’m saying the brackets should be continuous so there aren’t any sharp turns in taxation. Right now the brackets make the taxation discrete, but I feel it should be continuous.