I live in the USA, and our future seems more bleak than it ever has. Is not about politics, although politicians do have an impact on it. It’s really about our quality of life, and cost of living, which has not changed for the better, it seems, in a really long time. The cost of living keeps going up higher and higher, and much of our country still believes that even with increased cost of living, there is never any reason whatsoever to pay people more. So for instance, a job that paid 10 bucks an hour in the year 2002, that same job might still pay $10 an hour now. But I think we all know that the cost of living has dramatically gone up from 2002 to now.

Even White collar jobs though seem to be threatened to now, which is not something I’ve ever seen before. Positions like analyst, engineer, business intelligence, revenue management, whatever you want to think of. Any corporate office job, people are suffering. The cost of living is absurd, buying a house is simply out of reach unless you have dual income and it better be nearly six figure dual income…

I just don’t see how Americans at large are going to survive the next 30 years?

  • thefluffiest@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Is not about politics

    It’s all about politics. Just not about the 24/7 clown show that passes for politics in the US.

    It’s about who gets what, how the spoils are divided. It’s obvious how the deck is stacked against ordinary people: the middle class is being bled dry and the hoarder class is taking off with all of it.

    What’s extraordinary is that that somehow passes for ‘natural’ and ‘not about politics’.

    • DeadWorldWalking@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Well capitalism is based on the horrible unfeeling cruelty of nature, that we originally created human society to escape.

      So that’s why it feels natural. It’s the unfair unfeeling system of nature that society is not supposed to be

      • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not bees. Bees cooperate with each other, nurture their young, operate according to democracy, take nectar freely given by plants, and only use their stingers for self defence.

        Fun fact: old scientists believed the queen controlled the hive for purely political reasons. They wanted evidence in nature for the existence of monarchy. They were wrong. Bees are communists and monarchy doesn’t exist in nature. Neither does capitalism. No animal profits purely from owning something, they all have to put in work to get what they need to live.

  • lorty@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    You’ll realise just how little people will make do with. And how much lower what you considered a terrible standard of living can be.

  • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    It is about politics. You need to organise yourselves better into unions. Then, you strike until you get what you deserve.

    Why does Denmark and the rest of the Nordic countries have so high quality of living and happy people? Cause the people realized that you need to work together to get what you want. You need to have solidarity with your other workers to push for better compensation and work environments.

    Do this, or you’re doomed.

    • DuckWrangler9000@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      You need to organise yourselves better into unions. Then, you strike until you get what you deserve.

      It’s a system of bargaining. But if you have nothing that they don’t already have, you can’t bargain. How can you unionize, when they have so many applicants they can just fire you or outsource you to India and your government will never stand up for you? It’s not possible. COLLECTIVE bargaining. It doesn’t work if a few people do it, and I can’t control others.

      • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Of course it’s collective bargaining, that’s what I mean with “organize”. I don’t mean just organize within your workplace, I mean organize within entire fields and industries.

        Friend, you don’t know how unions work at a core level.

        This sounds kind of condescending and mean. In Denmark we have large unions that cover whole industries and fields and they work very well for collective bargaining and securing good levels of compensation, vacation and good work environments. I am myself a member of such a union. So please don’t assume that I don’t know how unions work.

        • DuckWrangler9000@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Sorry, didn’t intend for it to sound man and realized afterwards. I edited that part out. Read my other response. I don’t believe it’s as easy to unionize here in the USA as it is in Denmark. Denmark is extremely restrictive with immigration and is such a tiny country. If they started losing workers in a large number it would be very difficult for them to replace them. In the USA, we have 50 states, and incredible amount of land mass. People move around quite a bit for jobs, and when people start unionizing, they just fire everyone or make everyone terrified to lose their job. Just look at what happened with The Home Depot, largest hardware store in the USA. Basically, Home Depot lobbies strongly against it and provides severe amounts of misinformation to mislead people into thinking that they’re going to be a lot worse off, that they’ll get rewarded for voting against unions. These people are basically fighting against themselves and trying as hard as they can to screw each other over in hopes of a reward that never comes. And it’s totally perfectly legal, companies can basically paint unions as a nightmare that you will never recover from

          • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            when people start unionizing, they just fire everyone

            Yea this needs to be made illegal obviously. But that’s hard. And that’s where it becomes political. You can’t get around the fact that it is political unfortunately.

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Honestly, the ones who survive well are the ones who build communities that take care of each other: Sharing meals, sharing gardens, sharing skills and labor, sharing rides, sharing emotions and stories, etc.

    Capitalism was always pushing the US towards a gigantic class divide, and Boomers and Gen X carried that torch at the expense of their descendants’ future. Communities of support are something that will have helped regardless of who is carrying what ideology and regardless of who is in charge, and they thrive in adversity.

    So if you’re looking for advice, build your local communities. Strengthen your bonds with your neighbors. Participate in local governance.

  • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    You get milked by the big corpos. Money flows from the poor to the rich.

    And as long as you have only these two extreme right wing parties, there is nobody who would change it.

  • Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    You really believe we’re all going to die in the next 30years?
    Or are you being hyperbolic?

  • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I know this wasn’t your point, but I’ve been confused on a particular point for awhile:

    buying a house is simply out of reach unless you have dual income and it better be nearly six figure dual income…

    Just the general idea of it being impossible to afford to buy a house. And don’t get me wrong, the prices on houses have gotten ridiculous! At the same time, we talk about landlords buying houses and charging exorbitant rent (suggesting at the very least more than what they pay).

    So if rent is more than the mortgage, insurance, etc, then how is it impossible to buy a house if it is possible to rent (an equivalent home)? Is it the down payment (if any)? Costs involved in purchasing? Because it seems like month to month it would be cheaper.

    I say this as someone who has rented and owned, and owning felt significantly cheaper.

    (Full disclosure, I’m in the military, so I had access to a VA loan… though not really sure what that did for me except maybe allow 0% down… if other people are absolutely required to put up a percentage then I can definitely understand it).

    • tomcatt360@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I have the same question. It seems like a doable goal for me, and I only have an Associates Degree. Are people just bad at saving and paying their bills on time?

      • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        My question was less about how doable it is, and more… if you can’t afford to buy a house, how can you afford to pay rent (and thus someone else’s mortgage plus a little extra)?

        The last place I lived, I could afford my mortgage but I wouldn’t have been able to afford to rent an equivalent house. Hence my confusion.

        • rigatti@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’ve owned a house for a long time, but the issue is paying their current rent/bills while also saving enough for a down payment.

  • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    To be fair the USA seems to have the brightest future compared to basically any other country because you guys don’t have this imminent demographic collapse like most other developed countries like Japan, Korea, China, Germany, Italy, etc. And because of your geography and size you are would only be mildly affected by a WW3.

    Perhaps it helps to look at other parts of the world and see how comperativelly well you guys have it.

    I guess the biggest challenge is to minimize the huge divide between the rich and the poor. Sadly you missed the opportunity to choose Berny Sanders as your leader a couple of times, that would have helped a lot.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        heh, and republicans are going to lose their fucking minds when they start to see the consequences of the choices their leaders made. Like when fruit is like $10/lb because its all rotting in the fields because everyone who normally picked it is locked in a border concentration reeducation camp.

        Too bad we have to live with the consequences of their choices too.

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Yeah those voters aren’t turning against Republicans. Trump will piss enough people off that, if there’s a free and fair election in 2028, Democrats will win. However, every problem Trump causes will get blamed on Democrats, who won’t win a large enough majority to override their token centrist villains and pass meaningful reform, so we’ll end up with another even crazier Republican administration in 2032. From there climate change fucks us all up and we die in the water wars of 2035 or the great famine of 2038 or some other horrible thing that we’re too stupid to address before it slaps us in the face.

  • Montagge@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Learn how to live in poverty and go unnoticed, because no grand and noble revolution is coming

  • mke_geek@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    buying a house is simply out of reach unless you have dual income

    Not in all areas of the United States. Houses routinely sell for under $200k in my city. There’s also many for under $100k.

    • would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      People say this kind of thing a lot, but I don’t really understand if they don’t have any family or friends, don’t care about their family and friends, or just think it’s reasonable to have to choose between your relationships and living in an affordable house.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It sucks but you have to do what you think is best maybe the savings allow for some road trips to visit.

        • would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          My household is in the top few percentile, we’re fine. I just think everybody else should also have the luxury of not having to choose between relationships and shelter.

      • Coskii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I haven’t checked since covid, but Philadelphia usually has at least a handful for under 100k and a load under 200k.

        Granted they aren’t in great sections of the city and nearly all are row homes with existing issues.

            • lovely_reader@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I was struggling to find the right way to phrase the question, and I failed. I guess what I really wanted to know was: for a typical working class person, is a house at that price within reach? Or if you move there for the cheap houses and get a job, do you end up still barely able to afford the payments?

              • lonerangers1@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                25 days ago

                I moved to Detroit from a HCOL city I was established in. I was renting and the options I had to buy were not hopeful. The taxes alone would have kept me working for more money year over year for the foreseeable future.

                I took what would have been a down payment and bought a place outright. I bought a project and it was cheap, only half my down payment fund.

                Now I am all set up. I have no mortgage to pay. My house costs me taxes ($1700/yr) and insurance ($1500/yr) plus utilities ($50 internet, $150 gas&electric, $60 water) That is about $550/month.

                In michigan, taxable value increases are capped at 5%.

                I figure I can work any job and stay ahead of the bills. Yesterday I did a brake job for a friend of a friend for $200 and didn’t even need to leave the house. I can do things like this here and there and get by without even having a job.

                I have never known this amount of stability in housing as an adult before. It is wild. I own this whole damn house and everything in it. I also made a bunch of equity right out the gate by fixing up an abandoned trap house.

                Not trying to lay out a plan for others, just wanted to share how my plan has been a success and that Detroit is a place where home ownership is attainable.

                Oh, couple other things. I have no kids and the schools were not a problem for me. Although the neighborhood kids are all wonderful.

                I am not interested in living in “the country”. I am a city person, I want my resources close. I can walk to a hardware, grocery, and auto parts store from my place. No thanks on 30min drives to dollar general and TSC on the fancy days.

                • lovely_reader@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  25 days ago

                  This story is inspiring. I feel like there are a lot of people who wouldn’t feel like it’s within reach (no building/renovating skills or experience, or certain neighborhoods that maybe don’t feel safe to a single woman for instance, and yeah schools as you mentioned if you’re a parent or planning to be)—but for the people who can do that, it sounds like an absolutely phenomenal route to take.