• sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Then they aren’t really about efficiency, are they? When properly set up, WFH for office work is very effective and efficient.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      But think of the billions of dollars of now unused office space. That’s horrible for real estate pricing, which is where many of these fucks are invested.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s not even a real estate issue sometimes. I worked in an office in an industrial facility- printing custom boxes. Everyone in an office job was on a hybrid schedule. No one’s job required them to be at the office. All conversations were by Slack, all meetings were by Zoom even if we were all in the office. They could have knocked down the office space and put in at least two more industrial printers. Considering how backed up we got around Christmas, that would have helped them.

        Some of this is just old assholes who think people need to be in the office all the time so they can watch them or something. I don’t know.

        At least they didn’t make me wear a tie.

    • DankDingleberry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      they already said it themselves: “Requiring federal employees to come to the office five days a week would result in a wave of voluntary terminations that we welcome” so no, it was never about efficiency. at all.

    • Ooops@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      They are about more efficiency in enriching themselves. Forcing people back into inefficient office-based work is just a tool to fire huge chunks of them while filtering for those easier exploited.