Edit: to clarify: the message in the ad is actually ironic/satirical, mocking the advice for cyclists to wear high-viz at night.

It uses the same logic but inverts the parts and responsabilities, by suggesting to motorists (not cyclists) to apply bright paint on their cars.

So this ad is not pro or against high-viz, it’s against victim blaming

Cross-posted from: https://mastodon.uno/users/rivoluzioneurbanamobilita/statuses/113544508246569296

  • SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.worldEnglish
    7·
    28 days ago

    In this thread: difference in worldwide laws. In the Netherlands you get fined 65+ eur per broken or missing light on your bike. Checks are frequent.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zipEnglish
      2·
      27 days ago

      That’s good! I guess that’s the difference between viewing it as a utility vehicle and a recreational one. In the US it’s almost always seen as recreation only.

      • intensely_human@lemm.eeEnglish
        2·
        22 days ago

        If it’s gonna be around other vehicles, it should have lights for the purpose of traffic negotiation.