• Blaster M@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    24 days ago

    OpenWRT is cool, but I prefer OPNSense because unlike OpenWRT, you can actually upgrade OPNSense in its UI without requiring linux partition surgery.

      • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        I lost all my data from my router trying to update it using the ui and had to reconfigure everything. I use linux for a long time, but openwrt is on another level

    • Daniyyel@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      That’s why I wrote an Ansible playbook, to configure and update my router and access points. It’s nice having this almost as infrastructure-aa-code, with all configuration changes under version control with a clear commit message. The script is available at https://github.com/danielvijge/openwrt-configuration-ansible, but do make some changes to match your configuration. I keep my network configuration (inventory file) in a separate, private GitHub repo, as that contains passwords etc.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      I personally just buy MikroTik routers. Yeah, they’re not FOSS AFAIK, but they work really well and there are a ton of guides and whatnot. They also have a good assortment of hardware, so finding the right fit for my network is pretty easy.

      If I ever decided to go away from MikroTik, I’d probably DIY my own router instead of going w/ something like OpenWRT. I did my time w/ DD-WRT, Tomato, and OpenWRT, and honestly, I prefer my MikroTik router.

      • Blaster M@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 days ago

        I once setup MikroTik routers… they were cool, but the ipv6 implementation required manual intervention - this is not something you want with an isp that dynamically rotates their ipv6 addresses often. Once I discovered pfSense/OPNSense, it was so much better in configurability and ease of upgrade, as those OSses are FreeBSD-based and designed to run on PCs.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          My ISP doesn’t support IPv6, so I haven’t needed to touch that, but we’ll be getting muni fiber soon-ish (they claim the next year or two), so that could change. I’ll definitely think about upgrading to pfSense or something when that happens.

    • Shimitar@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      OpenWRT is a different scope than opnSense.

      I have a few OpenWRT devices to cover WiFi in my home and definitely an opnSense on top of them for wan access and all the fancy stuff.

      OpnSense can’t to WiFi access point, thanks to BSD limited WiFi cards support, and definitely cannot fit on cots devices like OpenWRT can.

      As well as indeed opnSense is a better choice than OpenWRT for edge devices.

      While OpenWRT would do opsSense job, at least in part, the opposite is not true.

      • Blaster M@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        Every single time I’ve setup OpenWRT, keeping it updated was much more painful than anything else, even ASUS WRT-Merlin was easier to keep updated.

        • doughless@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          Are you trying to say you’re not a fan of needing to reinstall packages after an upgrade? It’s so simple with these easy to remember commands:

          opkg update
          cat /etc/backup/installed_packages.txt | grep overlay | sed s/\ *overlay// | xargs opkg install