• Carrolade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    101
    ·
    19 days ago

    The CEO is an employee, a manager. You know how shops have managers hired by the owners to run the place? If that were the motive, wouldn’t owners be the preferred target?

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      82
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      Did you just say with a straight face that a CEO is simply a middleman who was powerless to change the internal workings of a system?

      • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        He’s right to suggest that a board of directors should possibly be looked at as equally to blame for a company’s policies and actions.

        • Kalothar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          19 days ago

          They should be, but they are harder to get to.

          I mean sure you want to kill the opposing militaries generals, but a captain or above is nothing to scoff at.

          Besides CEOs are more like a lieutenant or full bird Colonel.

    • bamboo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      19 days ago

      CEOs often are paid primarily in stock, so more than likely this guy had a significant ownership stake.

    • 5too@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      19 days ago

      If the CEO disagrees with the directions of the board, the CEO has a number of options. They can easily be considered culpable.