• gcvsa ⭐️🔰🇺🇸 🇵🇭@mstdn.plus
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    @PuddleOfKittens It is very much a mistake to suggest that “traditional” cities grew “organically” or “naturally”, or even that they represent “human scale”. Human settlement has always been subject to land use restrictions. The European and Japanese cities featured in this article as exemplars evolved they way they did under severe feudal land restrictions, not because there was any kind of conscious choice to build that way. Article is 11 yrs old, “New Urbanism” is no longer fashionable.

    • PuddleOfKittens@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      The European and Japanese cities featured in this article as exemplars evolved they way they did under severe feudal land restrictions

      Ok, how about the city of Pompeii (which was entombed by the volcano in ~50BC), or Tenochitlan/Mexico city (which was built before European contact, or the city of Cusco (ditto), or the city of Petra (which had plenty of spare desert)? Or Venice, or Mateba, or pick-a-town-any-town.

      What “severe feudal land restrictions” do you mean? Can you elaborate?

      Here on slrpnk.net I see quite a few “new urbanists” endorsing solarpunk visions with wide streets. I posted this partially in response to that.

      I could link a newer article, but this one works just fine. Articles don’t have an expiry date, if you have an actually valid criticism then say it.

      If it helps, replace “organically” with “incrementally and due to decentralized choices”.