Me: there’s a fire in my house! Please abolish it!

Fireman: Ok, we’re ready! What are you going to replace it with?

Me: what

Fireman: The fire. What are you going to replace it with? Fire has a purpose, you know, you can’t just remove it. The combustion that powers your car engine, that’s fire. And the fire in my woodstove heats my house and keeps my family warm. Fire is doing what it’s supposed to be doing, and in the correct place, at the correct time.

Me: It’s destroying my home. Please abolish it.

Fireman: Do you even know what fire is LOL fire is the rapid oxidation of a material in a self-sustaining chemical reaction, do you REALLY think you can just abolish that? Do you even know what you’re talking about?

Me: I’m fine with it existing just not in my house right now.

House: destroyed

Fireman: Why didn’t you give me a valid replacement??? We could have helped you.

  • IMALlama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    Electric stovrs and heat, in the form of heat pumps and traditional resistive, are a thing. Arguably you’re using magic to pipe a remote fire from a power plant or the sun into your house, so you can heat your house and cook without fire in your house. Bonus points if you use hydro and/or wind for power generation, then there’s turely zero fire involved.

    • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      And in the weeks it takes to install them, and months it takes to get wind (fine) and hydro (ecologically devastating) up and running?

      • IMALlama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        All I was trying to say is that there are already homes that do not rely on combustion inside the house for heat. I then took it the next step further, lol.