Cross posted to r/homeserver

  • hunterhulk@alien.topBEnglish
    4·
    1 year ago

    proxmox. i fine its very easy to work with and manage. also proxmox backup server is amazing

    • Neeen@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      Wow I just realized that I’m not backing up any of my Proxmox vms Thanks for the reminder friend!

  • aileanaodh@alien.topBEnglish
    3·
    1 year ago

    Arch. No Window Managers or Desktop Environments. Its easy to work with when no extra fluff is installed.

  • bozho@alien.topBEnglish
    1·
    1 year ago

    I use TrueNAS, mainly because I wanted a solid storage solution. I don’t really need many VMs, so I’m happy to run jails for stuff I need.

    I also run a small RPi4 server with a few docker containers (a secondary Syncthing server, TVHeadend server, etc).

    If I had a need for VMs, I’d run Proxmox (as I have some experience with it).

  • Flicked_Up@alien.topBEnglish
    1·
    1 year ago

    If you’re looking for a NAS and don’t want to invest on all disks right now, unraid. Otherwise truenas

  • dev_all_the_ops@alien.topBEnglish
    1·
    1 year ago

    If you want a beautiful front end for docker containers

    CasaOS/ZimaOS Cosmos-server Unbrel

    Otherwise

    • proxmox
    • truenas
    • unraid
  • GolemancerVekk@alien.topBEnglish
    1·
    1 year ago

    I think it really depends on what you intend to do with it… Many answers here will mention what they use but not why.

    In my case I want to have various services installed in docker containers, and I have the skills to manage Linux in console. A very simple solution for me was to use a rock-solid, established Linux distro on the host (Debian stable) with Docker sourced from its official apt repo. It’s clean, it’s simple, it’s reliable, it’s easy to reinstall if it explodes.

    Why containers (as opposed to directly on the host)? I’ve done both over several years and I’ve come to consider the container approach cleaner. (I mention this because I’ve seen people wondering why even bother with containers.) It’s a nice sweet spot in-between dumping everything on the host and a fully reproducible environment like nixOS or Ansible. I get the ability to reproduce a service perfectly thanks to docker compose; I get to separate persistent data very cleanly thanks to container:host mapping of dirs and files; I get to do flexible networking solutions because containers can be seen as individual “machines” and I can juggle their interfaces and ports around freely; I get some extra security from the container isolation; it’s less complicated than using VMs etc.

  • Tiwenty@alien.topBEnglish
    1·
    1 year ago

    Arch, because I’ve always had a better experience with it than Ubuntu, be it server or desktop. I also daily drive it on my desktops.

    It’s so much easier to setup. Only with Docker and MergerFS it’s a command and easily updatable, instead of the PPA setups or bash installs you have to do on Ubuntu. The wiki is still the best.

    And it’s way easier to maintain when there’s less stuff.