• ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    You seem to be under the impression that there is a fundamental material problem in composite bows that prevents them from being high draw weight. Here’s a study examining historical ottoman bows which note that while most average around 110 pounds, they go up to as high as 230 with 140 not uncommon. The glue and laminations did not make them fundamentally unable to reach those high draw weights, it’s just dependent on what the draw weight is. A self bow that you overdraw will crack as well. Modern recurves are lighter because they’re not meant for slave soldiers raised from children like the Janissaries. Once again, if you think it’s a material problem, realize that early Chinese crossbows were constructed with this exact laminating bone glue and sinew technology and could reach draw weights of a truly ridiculous 750 lbs if drawn by both feet by a truly expert crossbowman. They likely looked essentially like a laminated composite recurve attached to a stock with a trigger.

    https://www.tesble.com/10.1017/s0003598x0009565x

    • Forester@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      No, I’m trying to explain to you that one of these devices is meant as an defensive artillery piece to shoot over and beyond fortifications while the other is meant as a very accurate assault weapon to be wielded by mounted Bowman and shot accurately while riding a horse.

      Or to put it another way. Yes, you can take a cricket bat to a baseball field and slam a home run with it but it’s not meant for that.