• falsem@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    In the US, contracts are routinely deemed unenforcable by courts for being overly broad. A contract with an indefinite duration frequently falls under that category.

    • BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Perhaps that would happen if this went to court, but the fact remains that he (presumably) broke a contract he signed.

      It’s a question of integrity. If I sign my name on a contract, I do my best to uphold that contract, and I don’t think it’s unreasonable to expect others to do the same.

      • falsem@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The contract is forced on you in order to obtain employment when there is very unequal bargaining power. It’s also a contract that’s largely deemed illegal in actual courts. He disclosed information that is no longer business relevant and instead just an object of historical interest at this point.

        I suppose if you were forced to sign a non-compete to work for a fast food restaurant that you’d also honor that and not work for any other fast food restaurants if you had to quit?

        • BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ugh, I guess I have to include what I assumed would be obvious: “within reason.”

          It’s unreasonable to sign a non-compete contract for a fast food job where no entity can be harmed by the employee moving to a different fast food company.

          It’s perfectly reasonable to sign an NDA for a creative development job where sharing confidential information can seriously harm the company.