• Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You still see it though, especially if it’s a direct reply. And it is still a responsive system, that lets bigots just come back with new accounts and spew hate until they get downvoted in to silence, when they just come back with another account.

    Whilst the latter problem still exists even with moderators, at least a moderator can reduce the number of people exposed to hate.

    I’ve lived this. I have zero desire to use the system you describe, because I know it leads to toxicity that I don’t need.

    • cameron_vale@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      For older bigots you would filter them away.

      For brand new bigots. That might require a “if the person’s history is too small, exclude” type rule. Which is less than ideal, yes. Lots of false positives there.

      But let’s not put the cart before the horse. I think it’s a pretty good idea and I’d like to see it tested.

      • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        For brand new bigots. That might require a “if the person’s history is too small, exclude” type rule. Which is less than ideal, yes. Lots of false positives there.

        Doesn’t work. For trans folk particularly, throw away accounts not linked to their main account is often the first step of exploring their identity online.