A future-of-work expert said Gen Zers didn’t have the “promise of stability” at work, so they’re putting their personal lives and well-being first.

  • CptOblivius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    I just saw Docs, nurses and staff who had pensions for 30+ years just get butchered as the new Hospital system took over. Routed it all to standard 401ks. Why put your soul into a company. They will never come through. That ship has sailed.

    • Alto@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      My only hope is people look around at the fact that one of the few ways to still get a pension is through union work, and the current unionization wave continues into something bigger, better, and greater than we’ve had in the past.

  • Tiger Jerusalem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    It reeks of those headlines saying that millenials/gen zs are “losing interest in buying cars and houses”.

    Motherfucker, interest has nothing to do with it. We can’t afford it!

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Well interest does come into it. Y’all can’t afford the interest payments on the loans you’d need. Can’t even find a decently priced used car.

      • Tiger Jerusalem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Oooh, cool word play! I like it.

        Also, I find it funny* that we somehow can afford rent but are not qualified to pay a mortgage with monthly payments that costs the same.

        *enraging

  • sibannac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    I want to put the effort I give earning money to be put towards bettering my life. All my lemons are being juiced for someone else’s lemonade.

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I mean I’m GenX, and I’ve been fired from three different jobs for reasons beyond my control.

    The concept of working for one company for your whole career, getting promoted to a high paying position, retiring with a healthy pension simply no longer exists anymore. You can work hard and do everything right, even be in a division that’s making money and you still might lose your job simply because laying off employees looks good to the shareholders.

    But it’s all the fault of the young people! You just need to work harder… on your LinkedIn profile because what you do for the company you’re at right now doesn’t matter, it’s what it looks like you do that matters more now.

  • Delta_V@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Also, nobody wants to hire anymore.

    If employers get to say it when they can’t fill poverty wage positions, the rest of us get to say it when employers fail to offer 7 figure salaries.

  • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    You get what you pay for, pay your employees shit and get shit. Completely remove all rewards for hard work and no ones going to be incentivized to do more than the bare minnimum.

  • Deceptichum@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m curious about how different Gen Z is from Millennials here, because everyone in my age range that I know seems to share this sentiment with them?

    • UsefulInfoPlz@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Gen x here and we seen it coming as well but no options for us at the time. I don’t blame any of you. Corporate greed and the great 401k lie is bullshit. They want us to work till we’re dead. Screw them.

        • HarkMahlberg@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Can’t speak for OP, but I don’t look at the 401k as a stable retirement vehicle. It’s a vehicle to pump “dumb money” (read: casino chips) into the stock market. If the stock market downturns just before you retire, if the firm managing your 401k makes bad investments, if another 2008-style real estate collapse happens, your retirement fund suddenly has less money in it than you hoped, so you’re gonna have to work longer.

          • pdxfed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            if the firm managing your 401k makes a bad investment

            The administrator of your accounts has zero control over most of the funds available in them, their rise or fall, and your funds are separate from any investments that financial institution may or may not have made.

            If you have a 401k with fidelity, or ADP or Schwab or Trowe Price or whoever, some of those are banks, soke finance companies, some payroll, anyway, the point is for each, the money in your account is yours to allot and invest as you wish based on yhe invesrment options your company chose or negotiating with them to administer your company’s plan. The admin makes money by admin fees, not by taking your money and reinvesting it in something you don’t know about. Granted, yes if there is a stock market crash, most financial companies will similarly overall struggle, but they have lots of arms and operations (mortgage loans, commercial, consumer banking, investment banking, etc.) and they are 100% all disconnected from the money in your 401k.

            That said, 401ks are awful and a sham that were pushed on an uninformed public and we’ve only just begun to see the effects as the first generation reaches end of work age…and can’t stop working. It’ll continue. Props to anyone fighting and organizing against it or trying to avoid as much as possible. System fully bought and broken by greed.

            • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              What’s the point of your first two paragraphs? The person you responded to is 100% right. The point is to pump money in to the fuckin stock market so the wealthiest people can profit off that “investment”

              • pdxfed@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                The point was is the plan administrator has no control over whether the value of his account goes up and down, which Op said they did. I agree with everything else Op said but think it’s important since most people don’t understand the mechanics to learn about them so added the correct info.

                • AtariDump@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  When the plan administrator is picking the stocks in their “Target Retirement 2055” account, I’d say they have a large amount of control.

                  Now the S&P 500? Probably no control. But is it truly the S&P 500 or some bull shirt index fund from the 401k provider that’s not 100% following the S&P 500?

  • Perhapsjustsniffit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    X’er here. Been doing this my entire life. Fuck the corporate overlords. Everyone should prioritize life over work. Unfortunately for most the world is against them in this regard.

    • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Also genX, I went hard in corporate life for a long time, survived many rounds of layoffs and watched good friends go for reasons that are bad ones- until one fine day I was laid off with 18,000 others. Meanwhile they kept hiring H1B workers and doing stock buybacks and doing mass-layoffs every 2 years to keep the regional labor market full of competition and wages depressed. Knowing that they’re not interested in keeping their promises of stability and prosperity goes a long ways towards me never going above and beyond

      • Psythik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        It means only working as hard as you’re paid to. If the multi-billion dollar megacorp you’re working for is only paying you $18/hr, you only put in an $18/hr effort; i.e. Work just barely hard enough to not get fired.

        • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah, this is generally an ok attitude.

          The only exception I think is worth thinking about is “Don’t minimum-ass it in a way that makes it suck for your peers.” Like, don’t work nights and weekends to hit unrealistic goals, agreed. But like I won’t push up half-assed untested code that you’re going to have to maintain. I’m having trouble coming up with good examples off the top of my head.

          • Psythik@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            That’s a great point and actually a perfect example of how I really feel when I say “work hard enough to not get fired”. Should also add, “so long as it’s not at the expense of your coworkers” to that saying.

    • xX_fnord_Xx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      My grandfather was a garbage man so my father could be a fireman so I could stock grocery shelves whilst writing the Great American Novel on my days off.

  • Donkter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Promise of what? I think the major change with millennials and gen z is that we see through the dogmatism that is corporate culture. Even if the promise was that of the “American dream” 50 years ago it’s quite clearly not worth it to sacrifice your youth and 1/3 of your life (another third being sleep) to afford to sit around in a house and squeeze in stagnant social obligations for the rest of your life.

    Life is what you make of it, and familial loyalty to a company that doesn’t care about me just doesn’t cut it.

  • Nobsi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    The only reason i work 80 hours a week is so that my employees and my future children don’t have to have the same luck as me.
    If i had a regular life i would not ever work 40 hours.

    I see how little my dad gets as a pension and how much my grandpa got. I will not receive anything.