cleric_splash@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.ml · edit-21 year agoRed Hat refuses Alma's CVE patches to CentOS Stream; says "no customer demand"i.redd.itimagemessage-square75fedilinkarrow-up1519arrow-down121file-text
arrow-up1498arrow-down1imageRed Hat refuses Alma's CVE patches to CentOS Stream; says "no customer demand"i.redd.itcleric_splash@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.ml · edit-21 year agomessage-square75fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareAnonTwo@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up20arrow-down1·1 year agoMaybe I just don’t get it, but how does this work in any way that doesn’t make them liable for some company being exploited by something that they were aware could’ve been prevented?
Maybe I just don’t get it, but how does this work in any way that doesn’t make them liable for some company being exploited by something that they were aware could’ve been prevented?