• ABCDE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was paying for it, for four screens and multiple users, as permitted on their site.

          • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I guess they changed their minds then. Hypocrites or not I still feel like wanting to get paid for people using your service is reasonable. I’ve never used Netflix but if I did I’d imagine this wouldn’t affect me much as a paying customer. It seems to mainly be an issue for those who either travel alot or are using somebody else’s account

        • moobythegoldensock@geddit.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, they were using paid accounts.

          If I buy a frisbee and throw it to a friend, my friend doesn’t owe the frisbee company anything. I paid for the frisbee, I can do what I want with it.

          If I pay for 4 simultaneous streams from a video company, why is it that company’s business how and when I use them, or who I share them with?

        • ABCDE@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I allow people to use it for free as it’s not a huge expense, and it’s something nice to do.

    • Platomus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      The users were playing for the service tho.

      They then created artificial barriers to charge more for the service.

      They’ve been doing it consistently.