The day just isn’t complete without a tiresome retread of freeze peach rhetorical tropes. Oh, it’s “important to engage with and understand” white supremacy. That’s why we need to boost the voices of white supremacists! And give them money!

  • thesmokingman@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What fucking data do they show that deplatforming and demonetizing makes extremist views worse?

    we don’t think that censorship (including through demonetizing publications) makes the problem go away—in fact, it makes it worse

    Last I remember, actively demonetizing fringe views like Alex Jones damn near killed their reach. And quarantining on Reddit completely nuked organic reach which was, for a long time, how crazy shit was reaching people.

    history shows that censorship is most potently used by the powerful to silence the powerless

    In what fucking world do the powerful care about the powerless nazis. What fucking world. Didn’t we fucking fight a world war about this. It’s really fucking cliche to say but holy fuck why the fuck would the powerful ever care about censoring the powerless nazis.

    I think it’s important to engage with and understand a range of views even if—especially if—you disagree with them

    Shit dude the owner of Substack is not engaging with my view that he’s a fucking witless dishcloth. Kinda hypocritical amirite

    • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The idea that removing someone’s platform makes things worse is just insane.

      It’s not silencing them, it’s just removing their reach to spread their horseshit.

      • thesmokingman@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not even removing someone’s platform when they’re using your platform to spread their message. Cutting off their internet? That’s deplatforming. Throttling their bandwidth? That’s fucking with their access to utilities (internet should be a utility). Kicking them off your privately-owned site they don’t have a majority ownership stake in? If that’s deplatforming you’re admitting your platform is all about the Nazis.

        I do not understand these mental gymnastics tech bros go through.

        • sc_griffith@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m fully in favor of kicking nazis off of wherever specifically because doing so is censorship, deplatforming, etc, so gotta disagree with you there

          • thesmokingman@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It sounds like we only disagree on the specific word we use to describe the act of removing someone from a website so that’s an okay disagreement!

  • swlabr@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Basically: “If we don’t platform the nazis, where will all the hard earned nazi money go?”

  • gerikson@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Katie Notopoulos writes about the economic incentives for substack to keep Nazis:

    https://www.businessinsider.com/substack-nazi-problem-free-speech-money-analysis-2023-12?r=US&IR=T

    Also links to a post signed by a bunch of prominent substackers who are just fine with the policy as it stands. Contains the usual suspects of Bari Weiss, Edward Snowden, Matt Taibbi and Michael Shellenberger: https://substack.com/home/post/p-139757629

    Good to have on hand if you find any of them linked so they can be avoided

  • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We are committed to upholding and protecting freedom of expression, even when it hurts. As @Ted Gioia has noted, history shows that censorship is most potently used by the powerful to silence the powerless

    oh no, where these wittle powerless nazis will go? they are only backed by the likes of Thiel and Malofeev

    Organizations who try to silence and censor writers are the ones who have a real Nazi problem.

    you see, the real nazis were antifa all along

    As Elle said in her letter: “We are still trying to figure out the best way to handle extremism on the internet. But of all the ways we’ve tried so far, Substack is working the best.”

    We have investigated ourselves and found no problems. Any further criticism will be dismissed

  • sc_griffith@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We are still trying to figure out the best way to handle extremism on the internet. But of all the ways we’ve tried so far, Substack is working the best.

    All of this is contemptible but for some reason this quote he pulls is the worst bit to me. It’s so pompous and so arrogant for a tech bro to describe his Nazi funding company as “a way of handling extremism on the internet.” Not even something his company does. Just his company, existing

    • 200fifty@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      of all the ways we’ve tried so far, Substack is working the best.

      The sheer arrogance of this quote is really something to behold. It’s “working the best” by what metric, exactly, sir? And who’s the “we” that have tried various ways so far, because it’s certainly not ‘people on the internet,’ many of whom have developed ways of dealing with Nazis which are significantly more effective than the substack method of ‘literally give them money to use our platform’

      • Soyweiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hell, even 4chan deals better with the neonazis than Substack, as 4chan doesn’t fucking pay them.