The major questions doctrine, explained.

  • conquer4@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Or, charge several of them with taking bribes. As there is plenty of evidence already, they are not above the law.

    • speff@melly.0x-ia.moe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The moronic general public already thinks holding 45 accountable is “political persecution” source. This is with rocksteady evidence. And now you people are talking about charging R-aligned Justices on loose bribe accusations? Just… no. This is how you fire up their base and hand R’s the election with a supermajority.

      This is the Congress’ job to fix. Want it fixed? Stop relying on the president and start figuring out how to make Congress actually work again.

      • reddwarf@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This is how you fire up their base

        Not sure what more firing up the base needs in your opinion? That part of society is lost for quite a while now and if you think these morons could be ‘pulled back in’ as long as you do not insult/antagonize/etc. is a myth. A dangerous one at that. I would even wager that this attitude of soft gloves to not insult or fail to fairly accommodate the other side is what partially got us here.