• AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      134
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Market Capitalism has poisoned the very core of humanity, civilization, and literally the COMMUNal environment we all rely on from one breath to the next.

      Good thing the market capitalists are so fucking confident that the solution is… going harder on market capitalism. We’ll just merge, monopolize, and lay off our way into human happiness and equilibrium, won’t we?

      That’s why the owners propagating this system are building luxury bunker compounds in places like New Zealand, because they’re planning to clean up their mess and have confidence in a bright future!

      • Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Can you link to these NZ bunkers ?

        Also you know that NZ is basically a giant volcano. Lake Taupo, is a scheduled to blow and will wipe out most of the north island.

        It isn’t some magically island paradise that the rich can runaway from the world.

          • Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            9 months ago

            Just this year he lost a bid to build a new property which was to be built into a remote hillside alongside Lake Wanaka on New Zealand’s South Island.

            So no. No bunkers. Didn’t get approval and would be a pretty easy to find if someone gets approval for a bunker somewhere.

            Those two articles. Both articles and not much more than speculation.

            One article actually hints at it. However it doesn’t change the facts. NZ is a Yellowstone waiting to happen. Bunker or not the island is toasts.

            Also there’s a reason NZ doesn’t have skyscrapers an d concrete buildings. The amount of earthquakes would make building a bunker pretty dam near impossible.

            Deeper you dig to hide from calamity above you. Closer you get to calamity below you.

            • Meatchris@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              31
              ·
              9 months ago

              What’s your definition of a skyscraper? We have a load of buildings over 150m high, 40+ stories.

              We have fancy earthquake tech for our tall buildings, like counterweights.

              We’re the same as Japan, we’re both on the “ring of fire”, basically little scabs of islands where continents rub against each other.

              Japan has loads of tall buildings. And concrete ones too.

              “the island is toasts” lol.

              • Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                9 months ago

                We do have plenty tall buildings in Auckland Welly chc and stuff. But not dotted all over the island. Likely because you’d need to drill into volcanic rock. Which is pretty expensive and difficult to do. I assume they place the taller building in places without volcanic rock.

                Can you counterweight a bunker deep under earth ?

                That was my point

                I’m sure Japan and every other nation with super volcanoes had the same issues. Which is the point. NZ isn’t off planet. It has just as much risk as anywhere else. If not more due to Taupo super volcano.

                Which is overdue

                https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20230804-taupo-the-super-volcano-under-new-zealands-largest-lake

                • Meatchris@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I think expense & population not feasibility is why we don’t have them dotted all over.

                  Surely an underground rock bunker would be exactly what they’re looking for? Very “evil villain” aesthetic.

                  I’m dubious of claims of being overdue. How solid is the science backing those claims?

                  Well, the upside is if taupo goes, I should get a good view being only a few hours away 😬

        • Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          They’re also building quite a few in the heartland of the US. Although honestly I think they’re one big scam by the people actually constructing them – fully stocked luxury bunker for you, your family, friends, etc all on some billionaires’ dime. If shit hits the fan and you don’t let them in what’re they gonna do – sue you about it?

          The billionaire doomsday prepper mindset is ridiculous when you think about it for 30 seconds. Physical control over the resources around would be all that mattered, not how much Monopoly money you had in the before times.

          • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Not to mention that billionaires are fancy lads and lasses expecting to be waited on hand and foot. When their operations and Security people, people much more generally competent then them in every conceivable real world way, no longer has use for them or their paychecks, they will become their bunkers very, very quickly, especially because wealthy people don’t know how to share and will treat them as staff and not people, let alone friends.

            I can’t imagine them finding security that meets their standards for employment that also lacks opportunism. You don’t agree to protect Bezos from the hoards of Bezos’ victims without being selfish to begin with.

    • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      And for what reason exactly? IPOs are either for owners to cash out or for the company to gather investment money. RPi doesn’t really need money, they sell an extremely popular product. They literally can’t produce enough product to quench the Pi thirst.

      • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        this is the heart of the matter.

        business majors are taught if youre not growing your failing. if its not quarter over quarter kpi improvements youre failing.

        businesses dont get to just be. they are constantly forced into always getting bigger or more profitable apparently no matter what.

        any solid little company ends up getting bought and injected into the verticle… because humans are weak, and almost all of us have a price.

    • ember@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Raspberry pi’s business sector (aka Raspberry Pi Trading) has never been non-profit. That’s who is going for an ipo.

      Raspberry pics community sector (aka the Raspberry Pi Foundation) is the non-profit, and will remain as such.

      Edit: Here’s my source.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    241
    ·
    9 months ago

    Going public will fuck them up. Every corporate move will be tied to the stock. It will inevitably destroy them.

    Which, at this point, I’m here for. Although I do miss the days when they were a force for good. Or at least nerds. Ah well. Sayonara, you insulting bastards.

    • nodsocket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      108
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Raspberry Pi 5 is the first model that had 0 hype online. It seems people have already started to move on.

      • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        64
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Considering I could order an Orange Pi with 32gb of ram and still cant get a Rp5… yeah the king is dead.

      • Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        53
        ·
        9 months ago

        A couple years of not being able to buy them anywhere close to MSRP did enough damage I guess. Plus it exposed people to some alternatives.

      • yggstyle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        9 months ago

        For the price you can by a pretty competent n100 based mini PC which beats the hell out of the pi for a lot of tasks. Makers can get a cheaper solution via esp32 or clones… so what real market is there for it?

        Pi isn’t dead but the IPO would be a hail mary for funding while they figure out how not to go bankrupt.

        • Josh@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Somehow became the “Apple” of the sbc world. At least the software is still open source.

      • SaltySalamander@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        9 months ago

        Considering they retail for about what you can get a decent used mini PC for, one which would run circles around a Pi, I can certainly see why. At its current price, I would never consider a Pi.

      • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I think the shortage caused a lot of people to lose interest because they couldn’t get one, also a lot of the board improvements have pretty complex benefits so they open up new possibilities but don’t really have a killer app yet. I think the power requirements have pushed it out of the range for a lot of projects though.

        It’s so hard to tell if they’re heading towards a sweet spot or off a cliff with that one, I think the rest of their line is much stronger, zero 2 and the 3a+ or whatever it’s called are Ideal little boards

    • kby@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The RPi was always very overpriced. I think they knew they were selling a lifestyle product from day 1, you know, “here’s the new toy for the tech crowd that has too much money anyway”. Sometimes I cannot believe what ridiculous sums of cash people give out for SoCs with custom cases that are definitely not worth the pay-up, ex. the whole clockworkOS computers which got abandoned by the manufacturer few months going forward, and the massive financial hurdle to become a part of the user community means the community/fan crowd just implodes as soon as the tech bros find a more shiny device to waste money on. Then all you got is abandoned hardware with no community support.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The pi at initial release before all the supply chain problems, and Pi’s focus on corporate customers was $20.

        There was nothing like it which is why it deserved the hype.

        But now it’s $75 and needs a custom USB c power supply. So it’s pointless for most uses. As another pointed out, an N100 on the high end and esp32 on the low end make it a tiny niche.

  • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    184
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t expect people to see any change in how we do things.

    When companies say this, they’ll usually do the exact opposite later down the line.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Exactly that’s just bullshit to make people think everything is gonna be fine. It’s the stock market. People with the most shares demand you make them more money. That’s how it works. So everything will be turned upside down at some point.

    • JakenVeina@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      9 months ago

      Stating outright that you don’t expect the obvious thing that always happens to happen… bro you’re already giving shareholders a reason to say you’re an incompetent manager and replace you with someone that will gut the company for stock growth.

    • LemmyTryThisOut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      9 months ago

      When you hear this from any company, get out. Sell whatever you have in it immediately. Even if you take a loss, you’ll take a bigger one waiting it out.

  • bfg9k@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    171
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    AAAAAAAAA I HATE ENSHITTIFICATION

    WHY DO YOU ALWAYS NEED MORE FUCKING MONEY

    FUCK

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Its been coming for a while tho. They abandoned the affordable market long ago. Buy banana pis or other knockoffs, those have been better than the raspberry versions for a long time anyways…

      • Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        How is the community on the alternatives? I always hear that raspberry Pis is easier to beginners due to the community. Alternatives are cheaper and faster but doesn’t have a big community so not too user friendly.

        • downhomechunk@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          9 months ago

          I started with rockchip devices because I couldn’t get a real rpi. I had no trouble getting help for anything I was trying to do.

        • ferret@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Depends on what you get, grab an Ox64 to be thrown in the deep deep end, while anything that supports Armbian will be just fine.

      • ashok36@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        How did they abandon the affordable market? You can get a 1GB pi 4 for $35 today, the same price as when it launched. You get get a zero 2 for $15 I think. Just because the pi 5 is more expensive doesn’t mean they’ve abandoned the affordable market. They just widened the product line. Jeez.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      They don’t just want more money. He wants a huge payout for retirement. And fuxk everyone else.

  • ilmagico@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    9 months ago

    Didn’t they start as a non-profit? But I guess, as someone I know used to say, there’s one god everybody worships: the money god.

  • bartolomeo@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Oh no, the tipping point for enshitification. First it was selling all the stock to corporate clients, now this.

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It’s going to be a cash flinging fest. Sign up for the IPO, put your money there, sell in the next days. I am no day trader but I don’t know of a single time I’ve heard of an IPO that wasn’t heavily pumped for the first hours and days. Not that I’m a filthy capitalist swine who would do such a thing, I’m just saying.

      • AAA@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        All kinds of IPO don’t live up to their expectations. Facebook went down hard back in the day, for example.

        • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I think like this: “oh, that sounds cool and smart and has a catchy brand, a lot of people will buy things that sound cool and smart and have catchy brands, so let’s [hypothetically] buy that then sell it right after before the hype dies out in the face of reality”

    • Cheesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s good for existing share holders. IPOs can be bad for investors too. I wouldn’t want to touch this stock

    • DannyMac@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      2012, I think… that’s why I got my first Pi. I guess the enshitification will begin :(

  • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t think I’ve ever been excited about the IPO of a company I’m a customer of. This trend continues.

  • UnPassive@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    9 months ago

    My first Pi got me into computing which led to my software career now. Won it from a YouTube giveaway and kept it a secret because I wasn’t allowed to have a computer. Put retroPi on it and told my parents it was for gaming. Coded my first game in Python (from a tutorial). I once put it in a crayon box and used that as a portable handheld. Later. Made a janky arcade cabinet. Sad that my kids may need to use a different brand device. I have no love for public companies

      • UnPassive@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        They were scared of unmonitored access to the internet. And only up to T rated games were allowed, so for Halo I used to trade game cases with friends to hide what I owned. And since my parents were extremely Snoopy, I’d even switch my T rated games around so they thought I was just too lazy to match a game disk with it’s case, and never get too suspicious.

        Edit: Programming was allowed, just had to be on the shared computer in our living room where everyone could see what you were doing.

        When I was leaving for college I bought a laptop and they made me keep it in the box until I left. It was honesty torture. I wanted to set it up and stuff but they insisted that our home computer would work fine…

        • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Not to be too personal, but did that affect you a lot later in life, I mean the constant being on guard and fear of getting caught, to always have a lie ready to go and be nervous all the time? I find that if affects most people like that, but roughly one in five instead become super chill and really get their shit sorted. I’m not going anywhere specific with this, I just got curious from an academic and personal experience pov.

          • UnPassive@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            Yeah definitely some lasting consequence. I’m a pretty good liar, and extremely skilled at manipulating people to calm down. Sometimes I wish I stood my ground better and let there be friction between me and others. Instead I sort of morph into whatever they need, sometimes abandoning my core principals. It came in handy to save my siblings’ asses a few times though. But literally just yesterday my wife was video calling her mom and showed her my brand new ear piercings (which I’ve wanted my whole life, but is a huge no no for men in Mormon circles, so it’ll be a big deal when my side of the family finds out) - anyway, I wanna stretch/gauge them because I like the look of small tunnels, so my mother in law says, “they look so nice, but you won’t gauge them, right?” And I’m like “no of course not” because I know it’s probably a bit shocking to her that I pierced them at all. But I wish I instead said something non-commital like “not now, but I love the look of small gauges”

            Overall, the biggest effect is probably the distance I feel towards my parents lol

            If your curious, I’d describe myself as quite chill, but very reserved. I wouldn’t even say I was constantly on guard… I was just a good liar. Got caught for very few things. I have a lot of siblings though (10), so I doubt I’d have had as much opportunity if I were an only child or something

            • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              manipulating people to calm down.

              There are worse uses! It’s like I thought, you’re one of the good ones.

              edit:

              a big deal when my side of the family finds out

              I am sorry my man. That’s some silly shit for anyone to get upset about. Grats on the pierces! I got fuck drunk at a festival when I was 16 and came home to mom and dad with pierced eyebrows. There were some very very frowny faces at home for some time, but I got away with it. I think they knew that ultimately, I don’t give a shit what they think. I just happen to, but I don’t have’ta. Good thing with many siblings. Then you can flow around them and disappear in the crowd so to speak. Peace.

        • UnPassive@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          It was more about moral concerns of the internet. Pretty common thing for Mormon parents to do. But yeah entertainment may have played a role, they weren’t exactly what I’d call “active” parents.

          • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Sure, that’s the sort of thing I was alluding to. Not wanting to give a child a more capable system, while still giving them a distraction box.

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I was basically handed a C64 straight outta the womb, and I think I’ve been so spoiled by having such free access to devices and technology, and be able to just tag along for the ride of the IT revolution, so I didn’t bother to learn to code.

      I just figured that down the line they’d come up with AI that could code for me, and while I was right, I really could have learned coding and be a total IT pimp by now. Now I’m just an IT chump, which is still nice, but still.

      There’s something to be said of deprivation. If all you’ve got to play with is sticks and stones, that’s when your mind come up with the sickest creations.

      • UnPassive@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        My wife and I have wondered about this idea. If we were to have kids, we’d want them to be tech savy and inventive, but hopefully not get too addicted to the internet at a young age. There’s something to be said about not buying them a computer, but letting them build one, I think. But it’s an odd line to walk.

        Definitely will say I was interested in what I couldn’t have, but I do think there are healthier ways to fuel an interest. Hope that someday my kids will just want to tinker with my stuff

  • JCreazy@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    9 months ago

    I lost my respect for the raspberry pi foundation when they prioritize businesses over everybody else when there was a shortage.

  • treesquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I guess I better buy a new Pi before they quintuple in price for half the quality

    • xuniL@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      If you don’t need any of the Pi specific features. Then buy a sbc from another brand. You get way more for your money and more features

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        What are some examples of pi specific features which other brands don’t support?

        • wispy_jsp@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          There’s a huge amount variety between the alternative sbc providers, but I’m general:

          • some are simply designed not to have various bits of hardware like the camera 22 pin connector.
          • some fail to conform to the pis pin out or footprint, so hats won’t be compatible
          • more commonly, documentation and support is so poor that extensive dev/Linux experience is required to get existing hardware to work

          All of this makes it difficult to utilize alternatives without conducting considerable research into many different ones.