LOS ANGELES (AP) — A new California law that bans people from carrying firearms in most public places was once again blocked from taking effect Saturday as a court case challenging it continues.

A 9th Circuit Court of Appeals panel dissolved a temporary hold on a lower court injunction blocking the law. The hold was issued by a different 9th Circuit panel and had allowed the law to go into effect Jan. 1.

Saturday’s decision keeps in place a Dec. 20 ruling by U.S. District Judge Cormac Carney blocking the law. Carney said that it violates the Second Amendment and that gun rights groups would likely prevail in proving it unconstitutional.

The law, signed by Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, prohibits people from carrying concealed guns in 26 types of places including public parks and playgrounds, churches, banks and zoos. The ban applies regardless of whether a person has a concealed carry permit.

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    A policeman sees a drunk man searching for something under a streetlight and asks what the drunk has lost. He says he lost his keys and they both look under the streetlight together. After a few minutes the policeman asks if he is sure he lost them here, and the drunk replies, no, and that he lost them in the park. The policeman asks why he is searching here, and the drunk replies, “this is where the light is”.

    Concealed-carry permit holders aren’t the ones who commit gun crimes, but because they’re the ones who actually follow the law, they’re the ones that are targeted by these draconian rules.

    In California, no shooting by a CCW holder has ever occurred at an existing protected location or one proposed by SB 2. In fact, concealedcarrykillers.org lists just 5 homicides having been committed by CCW holders in California in the last 24 years.

    • 11181514@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      So draconian that I don’t want someone to bring a gun to a public playground or the fucking zoo.

      no shooting by a CCW holder has ever occurred at an existing protected location

      Oh wow maybe the ban works? Noooo it’s definitely because you scared idiots carrying weapons around all day are just SO responsible.

      Hey you know who’s 100% responsible for all gun violence? PEOPLE WITH GUNS.

      • butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        “Subset X of large group Y has committed a negligible amount of crime Y in the last generation.”

        “NO YOU IDIOT, LARGE GROUP Y DOES ALL OF CRIME Y, JUST THINK!!!”

        • 11181514@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Oh sorry I forgot only a subset of the people that own a thing made to kill other people actually kill other people. Good point go ahead and bring those guns hidden in your pants to a kids park or whatever. I feel so much safer now.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      draconian laws

      If the US has shown the world one thing then it is that the only rule that will really work is an absolute no-exception ban on firearms.

      Eric and Dylan have been dead for what, 20 years now, and what has changed? It. Got. Worse. They were amateurs compared to what followed. The Las Vegas shooting was beyond amazing and would have been prevented if weapons like these are only available on the black market for a million dollar with bullets costing 1000 bucks a pop. The crazies won’t be able to afford it and the very VERY few criminals that can afford guns and want to take that risk won’t be crazy enough to start shooting around at random innocent citizens and or bystanders.

      This shit only happens when weapons (and more importantly, bullets) are available freely and CHEAPLY.

      At this point, I’d say the US has had their chance.

      This entire “but we need weapons to overthrow evil governments!” claim is absolute horse shit, exhibit A being the day before yesterday, a year ago… Those same idiots always parrotting about overthrowing evil governments trying to overthrow a legitimate government so that they can install a dictatorship.

      The US has shown the world year after year that it’s citizens cannot responsibly handle firearms, period. Yes, I know, guns are cool toys, BUT FUCKING CHILDREN ARE DYING BY THE THOUSANDS.

      Sucks for those few that are responsible, you can thank all the incels and what not, but you won’t be able to shoot them for what they did, we’ll be taking those guns, thank you.

      PROHIBIT ALL GUNS IN THE US

  • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    ~13 people in the US have died from a "shooting"during 8 separate events 7 days into 2024, another ~30 injured.

    I’m also not saying state enforced concealed carry bans are the way, but you guys gotta do something.

    About half were murder suicides, a quarter were drive-by shootings and the last quarter were bar/party fights.

    • GluWu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      How many of those shootings were committed by someone who has a CHL? How many are committed by felons or criminals who are already prohibited from carrying any guns anywhere?

      • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, it’s nuts how weak this California bill was and we can’t even that passed. Legit pathetic.

        Can’t imagine having to raise kids in this country. Parents are brave, not giving a shit about all the legal guns

    • Zorque@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Sadly were stuck between “ban guns” and “ban banning guns” with little to no consideration for the underlying issues.

      I guess that’s too hard a platform to campaign on, though

      • Ooops@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Common sense, data and actual arguments? Yes, those are completely useless as a platform since post-factual populism has replaced real politics.