• LopensLeftArm@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is stupid. Don’t throw down an ultimatum you’re unprepared to act on. Are they really going to risk a Trump reelection if Biden doesn’t follow through? Almost certainly not, and they’d be idiots if they did.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are they really going to risk a Trump reelection if Biden doesn’t follow through?

      I mean yes. Young voters being disappointed with the electoral process and not voting has been a problem for a while, and Biden isn’t making it better. Unfortunately yes, they are likely prepared to act on it.

        • Nix@merv.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Biden bears the blame if he LOSES the election to trump. He’s the one running. Its his responsibility to EARN the votes. A ceasefire of an ongoing genocide is a tiny ask from “the most progressive president ever” who also is causing millions of deaths in the US from pretending the pandemic is over, making jokes about not wearing masks, and doing nothing to enforce clean air in schools, businesses, etc.

          It’s insane people are more angry at the threat of not voting for biden if he doesn’t do the bare minimum of calling for a ceasefire than being mad at biden for funding a genocide by an apartheid state using.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah true enough, but what I’m saying it’s not an empty threat. Some of these much-needed voters will sit out the election if nothing is done about this mess.

        • Machinist3359@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That blame cuts both ways. Biden neglecting the progressive leaders if the party is his own undoing. The right is happy to sink centrists, and thats why the US is drifting so far right.

    • Hyperreality@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ugh.

      America is going to re-elect Trump, not having learnt the lesson from last time, and here in Europe our politicians have become complacent again and continued to procrastinate on defense spending. But hey, maybe Ukraine will get the F16s they needed a year ago if they wanted to have any chance of avoiding a stalemate.

      • But hey, maybe Ukraine will get the F16s they needed a year ago if they wanted to have any chance of avoiding a stalemate.

        R has been resisting Ukraine aid. They aren’t getting shit if Trump gets in.

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This comment section should prove a nice starting point for a “if you try to hold Biden to a standard even a tiny bit above ‘is not Trump’, then that means you genuinely want Trump to win” party soldier/false dichotomy insister blocklist…

    • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What are people supposed to do when each election is close enough that any loss of support means handing over the presidency to an authoritarian wannabe?

      I’m sure many would like to hold him to a higher standard, but the risk of ending up with a fascist as president is way too high.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There you go with the false equivalency.

        You can support politicians without doing so blindly and unquestioningly. In fact, complacency like yours is one of the main factors that caused the conditions that made something as bizarrely awful as a Trump candidacy viable.

        • OurTragicUniverse@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          But you have a two party system?

          Are you still going to vote dem then and just keep making empty threats about not voting for them while requesting ceasefire?

          What are your other options here?

          • mild_deviation@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            The only option is to continue to vote for the least-bad candidates, and work to change the voting system such that a two party system is no longer inevitable.

            • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah, because that strategy has been working SO well so far… 🤦

              What was it Einstein supposedly said about the definition of insanity?

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I see that you’re aggressively ignoring the point in favor of the very false dichotomy I’m on the record as fed up with.

            To list the thousands of better things to do than either a) reflexively defend Biden no matter how wrong his stance is or b) vote for Trump would take a lot of time and effort better used in other ways than speaking to wilfully deaf ears.

            Fortunately, improving my Lemmy experience by adding you to the aforementioned list after adding a user note to remind me why takes significantly less of both than even writing this reply.