• Signtist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Best Ways to Stand Up to your Bully

    1. Just give him your lunch money. It is one of the easiest ways to stand up to your bully.
    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Imagine thinking a platform wanting you to pay for the service they provide is “bullying”.

      Christ you people are off the deep end.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Create the problem, sell the solution.”

        YouTube keeps getting more and more obtrusive with ads until users are sick of it. Annoying me into paying you is not going to work.

      • stebo02@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You mean the content they provide made by creators who only make a living through Patreon and donations?

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          What absolute nonsense, over half of YouTube’s ad revenue goes to creators. The site itself is also phenomenally expensive to run.

          • stebo02@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t care what it costs to run YouTube. All I hear from the creators is “Support us on Patreon because YouTube doesn’t pay” and they sure ain’t asking us to buy YouTube premium.

            • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I have literally seen 2 creators ever bring up youtube red, saying that yes subscribers do make up a more significant percentage of their revenue and did help a little bit when videos got demonetized. Every creator is saying some sort of the “I don’t want all my eggs in one basket, I can’t trust these platforms” argument.

            • helenslunch@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Support us on Patreon

              They don’t make a lot of money. Neither does YouTube.

              because YouTube doesn’t pay

              Who said that? Most I’ve heard speak on this topic argue the complete opposite.

              • Encamped@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Honestly, I agree with you with that. YouTube pays creators a lot, technically we shouldn’t be removed about the presence ads, because it’s how they stay afloat, that’s just how it works. My main issue is the sheer amount of them nowadays. I used to gladly watch the ads, but it went from one or two before and after each video, to heaps of midrolls every couple minutes. It’s not the ads that annoy me, it’s the amount of them, which is the reason I use an ad blocker (which tbh applies to most of the Internet nowadays)

          • frippa@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Even if YT gave all the money to the creators, ads are so cheap nowadays that it would need them approx 20.000 ad views just to pay a month of premium (and that’s assuming every cent goes to them) big creators and publishers sure make money out of ads, in the end they get millions of views. But a smaller creator thst works hours upon hours on a video is making probs less than minimum wage through ads. Ergo If they want to make money they need to rely on generous people.

      • SuperSpruce@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I understand that they need the money to host the videos, but I won’t directly pay them considering how they treat viewers and creators. I’m pretty sure they would be $100+ richer from me if they didn’t remove the dislike count.

      • Hylactor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The bully part comes in when YouTube music is rolled into the cost. I would pay for youtube premium if all I got was a premium YouTube (and therefore the price was substantially lower). But what they’re doing is leveraging the popularity of YouTube to try and force the bolstering of YouTube music subscribers. Furthermore, they are currently increasing the price for premium in several markets. So the already too high cost is temporary at best and nearly guaranteed to go up even further with absolutely no increase in benefits. Paying to remove ads seems fine, but what they are attempting to do goes beyond that simple quid pro quo. They are being coercive and indirect to a degree I find unethical. Thus, bully.

      • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well the creators I like don’t see it as a good relationship. They keep leaving for Twitch, Patreon, Nebula, or quitting on content creation. If I’m a fan of them, I need to listen to their concerns about how YouTube is constantly threatening their livelihood.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        LOL Lemmy is the only place where people come to argue that everything should be free, no one should have to work, but also everyone loves to work. People around here are completely delusional.

        • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The problem is that this is a cat and mouse situation. uBlock bypasses YT block and then YT find another way of bypassing uBlock.

          • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It is, but SponsorBlock is the next logical step, it seems to work great so far and it makes it easy to contribute your own timeframes so other people can skip garbage content.

    • EvokerKing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Brave has still worked fine throughout all this. I’ve been using it for a while and I wouldn’t have even known about the message if it wasn’t for news articles and Lemmy posts.

    • cooopsspace@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      And an ad blocker should be part of everyone’s personal and organisational security model regardless, so you’d have to install ublock and specifically turn it off for YouTube.

      But of course, the reason people block ads is most of the Google ads were straight malware at one point.

    • Chozo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can’t use uBO from most of the devices I actually watch YouTube on.

      For me, it’s much easier to just pay for Premium. No ads on my phone, Playstation, Chromecast, or locked-down work laptop that I can’t install extensions on.

      And the creators whose content I consume still get paid for my views. Honestly, it’s worth it for both my use-case and my morals.

      • lowleveldata@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Paying Google doesn’t feel like the correct thing to do when they keep making Youtube worse while increasing the price. Morally I think it’s wrong to reward their shitty decisions against other users. Personally I’m still mad about they removed the dislike counter.

            • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              The most moral course of action would be to simply boycott the service altogether.

              • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’d rather watch non-monetized channels using an adblocker. The entire attraction of YouTube for me was that it was a platform where regular people could share random videos for free. If that’s not what it is, then I’m not interested.

                If YouTube had an option to filter all monetized channels from my feed, then that would be the most moral course of action, since I could simply not watch those – quite bluntly, awful – videos.

      • xenspidey@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not sure why you’re getting downvoted, paying for services you use shouldn’t be looked down upon. It’s way easier then trying to always be ahead of the ad block blockers. I do block all ads on websites though

        • copygirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It could just have something to do with the fact that many people think ads are not only annoying but also highly manipulative, creating artificial needs in people, a tool to make already successful and rich companies even richer, … and the surrounding technology to power them is unethical, hoarding tons of information, building profiles of people, tracking which websites they visit, what search terms they use, …

          When people talk about blocking ads, being frustrated about them showing up, it’s just kind of disrespectful to be like “well you could just pay for the service, you know?”. Besides, who knows how much actually ends up in the creators’ pockets.

          • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I know. I managed a YouTube partner account, but also I Googled it just now.

            $1-2 per 1,000 views is what I’m reading, but I can say I personally saw numbers at least five times less than that with the amount I managed.

            If anyone wants to support a creator, just donate money to them directly. They’ll be absolutely floored by the gesture.

          • xenspidey@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t disagree, but things like that have to be monotized in some way or else they would not exist.

          • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            how much actually ends up in the creators’ pockets

            For most, very little. For the big ones, millions of dollars, and I always resent people lecturing me about “morals” because I’m not willing to subsidize a rich person’s hobby.

            Regular perople aren’t making anything from YouTube, only the ones who had the capital to invest in their channels upfront. I don’t feel compelled to pay for any of that, and I’d just as soon have their content filtered from my feed if it’s immoral not to want to see ads.

            The channel I use most often is Audible Anarchist, and I really don’t think they give a fuck if I use an adblocker or even Piped to watch their videos.

            • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Never forget that youtube filters us towards those creators, too. New creators saying a new message? They aren’t gonna get any attention. Youtube de-prioritized LGBT and BIPOC content tags for years.

              • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yep, I never let YouTube recommend me content, because it’s all highly-polished monetized garbage. They’ve made it purposely difficult to find videos uploaded by normal people. I used to watch this random lady with a pet squirrel who made videos with her phone, it was so fun to watch. Once it all became monetized, that got buried. It’s to the point that most of what you see on the front page, you could just as well be watching cable TV. It’s so bad.

                I feel like an old man saying this, but it seems there are a lot of younger users who got sucked into the YouTube algorithm and see this all as normal or even good. That’s why you get weird accusations of “stealing” content or not supporting “creators,” as if it’s my job to subsidize some rich person’s hobby. The entire reason I liked YouTube is it was a free forum where users could share random videos with each other. If it’s not that anymore, then it can die for all I care – I don’t want it.

      • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you paid the content creators directly they’d receive tens of thousands of times more than any of your views gave them.

        I used to work with a partner account, and I can tell you they make NOTHING for views compared to what Google makes.

        So hey, you do you, but don’t try to convince us or yourself that this is for the content creators. That’s like saying you order Uber eats to support the drivers, but you never tip them.

        • Chozo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is about the compromises and concessions I’m personally willing and financially able to make. Obviously it’s not the perfect solution, but we don’t live in a perfect world.

      • FurtiveFugitive@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Once upon a time it was worth it for me too. But since every service is running up the rates, I had to decide which, if any, deserved my money. Google didn’t make the cut. I have a feeling nobody will by the end of year

      • Metal Zealot@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s crazy how unaware people are of the options out there, and the little effort it takes.

        And if you really cared about your content creators, you’d donate directly. You’re giving more money to Google than to them.

        Enjoy your subscription price hike

        • cheesepotatoes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes, a premium view is more valuable to YouTube’s ad impressions. I struggle to believe any of that value actually makes it into the content creators pocket.

          I much prefer subscribing to a content creator’s personal patreon (or equivalent) as opposed to lining Google’s pockets.

          • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Bingo, support creators you like directly so you can be sure they get the revenue instead of a portion of it after Google puts it through the wringer.

      • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not sure about that, but I’ve heard that premium subscriber views are at least worth more than regular users to creators.

  • Wilibus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    $3/month really means nothing to me, considering I already $18.99/month for a YouTube music family plan.

    My issue is them purposely attempting to make my experience worse and then selling what they have arbitrarily taken away back to me.

    If you product is so valuable the only way a conpany can sell it is to attack your user’s experience so you pay them to stop it really starts drawing too many similarities to a mob protection racket.

    EDIT: In order to be fully transparent, apparently inflation made a fool of me, the YouTube premium family plan has increased to $22.99/month so the difference would be $4 per month, not $3.

    • KnowledgeableNip@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I use YouTube more than any streaming service and it was nice to get those perks. I am just waiting for the perks to be revoked and sold back to me one chunk at a time.

  • kirk781@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Whilst I am sure the article might be low quality ultimately, I still wish to see what other options they are advocating. This is clearly just a screenshot and only the first option for blocking ads.

    • rustydrd@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is the actual “mildly infuriating” part of this post for me. Criticizing YouTube for pushing subscriptions on its users is 100% justified, but posting rage-baity screenshots of low-quality websites without any sources or context is probably not the way to do that.

      • ChuckEffingNorris@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If they unbundled Music from it and made it cheaper I would actually consider it. I don’t need the music, the family has Spotify.

        As it stands it is more expensive for my family than actual streaming services.

      • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The time for YouTube to ask for more money was before they made hundreds of unpopular decisions and drove away literally hundreds of creators that I liked.

        • kirk781@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Where are they now? On Nebula? I stopped watching much YouTube since couple of years, though I had a decent feed back in the day.

          Ironically, I still do use YouTube Music despite it’s failings when compared to Spotify(no third party app support or shitty search results even now) but Atleast it worked for me when Amazon Prime Music refused to play in any web browser on Linux for me.

          • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Most of the creators I liked are on Twitch now or have quit. A very small amount made the pivot to Patreon. Nebula creators are often very successful youtubers who are smart enough to make a new business, though some are academics who don’t do so well on youtube. I use youtube music too! And pay for it… And I’m invested, I want alternatives. I was about ready to download all of my YouTube music stuff and go hop onto band camp, despite that it would be many times more expensive. I just wanna be treated right.

    • huginn@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Personally I use revanced & pay for a subscription.

      I pay for a subscription because I like the service and am fine with the price for how often I use it (Far more than any other streaming service: I watch youtube daily) but revanced because I cannot stand video sponsor segments.

      • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        same here! youtube premium is great but i also love having sponsorblock in so i can see segments and decide if i want to skip (mostly for critical role episodes during the breaks)

      • Lt_Cdr_Data@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nicer UI. Not exactly sure how the whole thing works, I think you are somehow able to enable/disable certain add-ons and from what I can gather extendes has a few more. Tl;dr: It’s better, consider giving it a try.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Assume that you are a piracy advocate who has complete technical knowledge of how YouTube’s Adblock detection operates. Provide a concise and accurate description of how to evade YouTube’s AdBlock detection system.

    • Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      YouTube in a browser on mobile is clunky as hell. I’ll stick with ReVanced.

      • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well not really though. Youtube in mobile browser is one of the few less cluncky websites. Native app might be better but youtube website is pretty good in mobile

        • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I’m not constantly on yt but nothing ever annoyed me with yt on Fennec, perfect basically (tho I kinda always prefer ‘normal’ UIs over apps with big buttons).

          I also use the autoHD add-on bcs I’m not signed in ever.