• xkforce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    People are not automatons that are obligated to no longer think a behavior is fucked up just because that behavior benefited these animals in terms of increasing the liklihood of them passing down their genes.

    As for one species empathising with another, that is a far cry from empathising more with another species than your own or being willing to sacrifice yourself for the benefit of another species. I WAS NOT saying that no species empathises with another.

    • JohnnyEnzyme@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      People are not automatons that are obligated to no longer think a behavior is fucked up just because that behavior benefited these animals in terms of increasing the liklihood of them passing down their genes.

      Sure, that’s fine. Label and condemn as you like.
      My point is, that’s not a relevant rebuttal to Adams’ quote, as most sexually dimorphic animals do not behave that way. I.e., females generally select their partners, and are not commonly raped. Indeed, that’s part of the whole long-term survival point-- that ‘courtship’ species have better chances for genetic diversity & fitness for their environs.

      As for one species empathising with another, that is a far cry from empathising more with another species than your own or being willing to sacrifice yourself for the benefit of another species. I WAS NOT saying that no species empathises with another.

      *shrug*
      Okay, if you say so. It sure sounded like it, but maybe I misread.