The measure to make vehicles weighing 1.6 tons and over pay 3x the parking rates for the first two hours has passed in Paris.

Now, let’s get that in place for London and many other other places to help slow, and even reverse, this trend towards massive personal vehicles.

  • AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    11 months ago

    I might be wrong but most people who live and work in Paris don’t drive. They have great public transit and there’s a huge walking culture. When I was in Paris the only large vehicles I saw where taxis.

      • HonestMistake_@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Hopefully the next step is to just…not have parking spaces that big. Make sure there’s just no way to park the thing anywhere in the city, that could actually make a difference.

    • azimir@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Your impression seems correct. I haven’t manged to get to Paris yet, but the numbers I found align with your experiences. From a transport in Paris article:

      “Paris has one of the most sustainable transportation systems in the world (private cars are only 12% of the overall traffic)”

      “According to a 2018 INSEE survey, a majority of Parisians (64.3 percent) use public transport to get to work. Only 10.6 percent commuted to work by automobile. 10.5 percent walked or used roller skates; 5.5 percent commuted by bicycle; and 4.4 percent commuted by motorbike”

      The local residents use public transit or walk/bike for work. They likely do exactly the same for daily errands, shopping, and entertainment. That’s how it was in Berlin, London, and Helsinki when I was in those cities and it’s wonderful.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_in_Paris

    • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      If nothing else, its making the “Pro-Driving Big Things Just Because I Can” people mad and I’m all for it.

    • wopazoo [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Are you against any sort of tax for oversized vehicles? Do you also believe that congestion pricing “hurts poor people”?

      Also, giant SUVs are only accessible to the rich anyways. No poor person is driving around an Audi Q8 or a Cadillac Escalade, they take the train.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        When giant SUVs are only accessible to the rich anyways, then the whole premise of tripling parking fees is meaningless to begin with. And yes, I’m against the idea of trying to solve the problem using a tax because it’s a performative measure that accomplishes nothing of real value while distracting from real solutions. I believe this accomplishes about as much as carbon taxes.

        • wopazoo [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          When giant SUVs are only accessible to the rich anyways, then the whole premise of tripling parking fees is meaningless to begin with.

          Driving your car seems free because you’ve already paid for it yesterday at the pump. Expensive parking puts a real, visible price on driving that you have to confront every single day.

          The rich doesn’t solely consist of Jeff Bezos and co. Most people who drive luxury SUVs cannot afford tripled parking prices in the city every day. And even if they could, this forces them to reconsider their habits and maybe take the train next time.

          And yes, I’m against the idea of trying to solve the problem using a tax because it’s a performative measure that accomplishes nothing of real value while distracting from real solutions.

          This is not a performative measure, this is the real solution. Driving needs to become multiple times more expensive, and a tripled parking price is a good place to start. Drivers are heavily subsidized by society and this subsidy needs to end, and these taxes are the first step in that direction.

          I believe this accomplishes about as much as carbon taxes.

          You can’t be fucking serious lol.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            The rich doesn’t solely consist of Jeff Bezos and co. Most people who drive luxury SUVs cannot afford tripled parking prices in the city every day.

            [citation needed]

            This is not a performative measure, this is the real solution.

            Sure, just like carbon tax.

            You can’t be fucking serious lol.

            I can be fucking serious, and if you genuinely think carbon taxes are accomplishing anything meaningful then what else is there to say to you.

            • wopazoo [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Let’s cut to the chase: do you oppose congestion pricing?

              Do you oppose congestion pricing because it “hurts the working poor” and that it’s just a “performative gesture”?

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                I don’t think it’s the right approach for meaningfully addressing the problem. The real solution is to invest in building public transit infrastructure, to design cities to be walkable. Congestion pricing simply creates a penalty for people without providing them with alternative. Should be pretty easy to understand why this is not a real solution.

                • wopazoo [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  The real solution is to invest in building public transit infrastructure, to design cities to be walkable.

                  We are talking about Paris here. Paris has the best public transit infrastructure in the world. Paris is highly walkable.

                  People who drive downtown have no excuse for their actions and must be penalized accordingly.

                  When London implemented congestion pricing, it significantly improved traffic and encouraged people to take transit. You are completely ignoring reality if you oppose congestion pricing on the basis of it being ineffective.

                • 7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Congestion pricing simply creates a penalty for people without providing them with alternative.

                  Are you seriously arguing you can’t get around Paris without a car lol?

        • BoxedFenders [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          The thing is, SUV prices depreciate, and people who would never be able to afford a new one can easily obtain them used. Gas prices are obviously not enough of a deterrent even to those living paycheck to paycheck. Some additional barriers to disincentivize the choice of driving the largest car they can afford is very welcome.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Again, my point is that this approach creates a two tiered system where people who can afford it get to flaunt the rules everybody else has to play by. An outright ban that applies to everyone equally is a much more fair measure.

            • wopazoo [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Please show me the mythical poor people who are driving around downtown Paris in their SUVs. Please, show me one! They don’t exist! Please stop pearl clutching over the plight of the mythical poor Parisian SUV driver!

                • wopazoo [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  You have got to be American right? The right for one to drive their big-ass SUV downtown is not something the Parisian working-class is concerned about!

                  Working-class Parisians are not buying and driving big-ass SUVs downtown anyways! No poor people are being harmed by this!

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I own an SUV and I’d still vote for a parking tax on them. Or pay per pound, estimated of course. You don’t want people deciding to go for the mega F-250s because they aren’t subject to the SUV tax.

    • azimir@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      We have two: A Ford Explorer (really trying to get the money to get rid of it) and a Forester. The Forester is small enough that it wouldn’t be triple pay in Paris, but the Explorer is a 3 ton brick. We had it because a few years back we still had six kids at home, but now that they’re filtering off to college, we are desperate to downsize. We’re being stopped because our city’s public transit (yay US cities) is a shitshow and our workplaces haven’t given us raises in years. Yes, we’re looking for other work, but so far it’s been tough to find things in our field, etc.

      As soon as we can, that vehicle is being kicked to the curb. It’s a terrible waste.

      • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah I similarly got the SUV because of kids and I think there are use cases for them, they’re just vastly overpurchased and a tax could curb that.

  • BoxedFenders [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    The SUVs in Europe are also smaller on average than the behemoths on American roads. The largest ones you will come across in France will be BMW X5 sized. And while they are large, they are utterly dwarfed by SUVs like the Suburban, Sequoia and Escalade. An Escalade vs X5 comparison here.

    • azimir@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      Indeed! It’s really hard to explain just how much smaller the traffic feels in European cities, even when there’s lots of vehicles they’re still less massive overall. I have taken video footage of traffic in a few different European cities just to show people how much smaller, quieter, and less dense rush hour traffic is. Even when comparing it to my US mid-sized city’s traffic.

      It’s just nicer to be around roads with fewer and smaller cars.

  • NeelixBiederman [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    So any car over 3,200lbs. my subcompact Honda Fit weighs 2300lbs. The 2024 Honda Accord weighs 3200lbs. I know eu has many more subcompact options than the US, cuz every car available here is basically an increasingly egg shaped amalgam of station wagon SUVs that weigh 4k lbs.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I was wondering how they would define what an SUV would be. If they’re using weight, won’t they be charging a bunch of electric cars extra too?

        • wopazoo [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          One electric car is better than one gasoline car, because electric cars don’t fart toxic gases into the air where everyone’s trying to breathe.

          I’d take 10 electric cars over 7 gasoline fart cans any day of the week.

          • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            But we’re talking a very large city where the goal isn’t to make driving a car more expensive “just because” its to reduce the number of cars in town.

          • 7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            One electric car is better than one gasoline car, because electric cars don’t fart toxic gases into the air where everyone’s trying to breathe.

            Nah, the fart particles are still there though and those get worse with weight

            • wopazoo [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              the fart particles are still there though

              As a person who rides bikes a lot, I strongly prefer sitting at a stoplight behind an electric vehicle over a gasoline vehicle. Tailpipe emissions matter a great deal even though EVs don’t completely solve the problem of cars creating air pollution.

              Of course, I still prefer no cars over electric cars.

              • 7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                11 months ago

                I mean, much the same, but I’m kind of split whether they’re meaningfully better. Unless it’s smog smog I have some ways to avoid car exhaust, like not standing directly beside it, where I live even the law allows for that. I don’t put down enough watts to transport myself to a stable orbit.

                But, just to be clear, this is me arguing against all cars, not pro gasoline cars over electric cars

                • wopazoo [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I’m just mad that my city built a new protected bike lane along a busy road, but the air smells so bad because of car exhaust lol

      • HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        As they should. This is foremost a measure to make cars smaller and allow for less dangerous and stressful daily commutes by foot/bicycle.

      • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        From the article, its mostly about weight with Electric Cars having a higher weight threshold than Non-Electric Cars.

        Also from the article, its not a ban, its just higher parking prices. So if you’ve got the cash, you can drive an H3 into downtown Paris all you want.

    • azimir@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yup. EVs also run into the tonnage limit quickly too. A Tesla Model 3 single engine is 1.75 tons (no extra parking costs), but the dual motor is over 2 tons.

      The US has way too many vehicles that should be about 20-30% smaller and lighter for basic city driving. Even the “small” vehicles aren’t small anymore.

  • Auzy@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I drive a Jeep (the unlimited though, so the large one). Good…

    I want to see a trend towards smaller 4wd’s and other cars. And I seem to be the only larger car that can park within the lines too. And the height of my car is low compared to the people with Rangers or Dodge Ram’s (and it is rare to see any of those actually towing anything). In my case, I run a hiking group, so really need a 4wd, but will probably be looking at something more economical and smaller, like a jimny

    I was hit by a car once when I was on my scooter, and I was lucky it was by a small car…

    And I feel larger cars like me should pay extra (and I agree with some comments saying to charge per additional weight). We have a toxic culture here where people are moving towards big cars just to impress others (along with the toxic nonsense that comes along with it), and this is the only way the culture will change

    • azimir@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Do you think that would stop people who buy Escalades and Ford F250s? They already drive over the lines in my city because they’re too wide. The vast majority of people who buy those kinds of vehicles are self-centered and selfish enough to not care if they’re being dangerous in narrow lanes. They are already doing that.

      Hell, I saw a person drive their Ford F650 to fucking Starbucks last week. It barely fit into the parking lot. Not a parking spot (it definitely didn’t fit into that), but even just turning and maneuvering in the lot was nearly impossible. He likely burned a gallon of gas just jockying in and out of the lot.