Share your unfiltered, unpopular gaming opinions and let’s dive into some real discussions. If you come across a view you disagree with, feel free to (respectfully) defend your perspective. I don’t want to see anyone say stuff like “we’re all entitled to our own opinions.” Let’s pretend like gaming is a science and we are all award winning scientists.

My Unpopular Opinion:

I believe the criticism against battle royales is often unwarranted. Most complaints revolve around constant content updates, microtransactions, and toxic player communities

Many criticize the frequent content updates, often cosmetic, as overwhelming. However, it’s optional, and no other industry receives flak for releasing more. I’ve never seen anyone complain about too many Lays or coke flavors.

Pay-to-win concerns are mostly outdated; microtransactions are often for cosmetics. If you don’t have the self control to not buy a purple glittery gun, then I’m glad you don’t play the games anymore, but I don’t think it makes the game bad.

The annoying player bases is the one I understand the most. I don’t really have a point against this except that it’s better to play with friends.

Overall I think battle royale games are pretty fun and rewarding. Some of my favorite gaming memories were playing stuff like apex legends late at night with friends or even playing minecraft hunger games with my cousins like 10 years ago. A long time ago I heard in a news segment that toy companies found out that people are willing to invest a lot of time and energy into winning ,if they know there will be a big reward at the end, and battle royales tap into that side of my brain.

This is just my opinion

  • ayaya@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What do you mean too expensive? While the higher-end GPUs are still ridiculous, you can find something like the 6650XT for ~$200 and that is more than enough for 1080p gaming. Meanwhile SSDs and RAM are at an all-time low price because of how cheap NAND flash is. Throw in a previous gen Ryzen 5 or i5 for ~$100 and you could easily build a competent gaming PC for $500. Plus you don’t have to pay the $60/year tax for online and get access to Steam sales and mods. And torrents if you’re into that.

    • Styxie@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m talking about something which can achieve parity with the 4k graphics that console gamers expect nowadays. That’s not remotely affordable on PC, but it is for consoles.

      • DrQuint@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “”“upscaled”“” 4K, righto.

        I dunno why people expect extreme levels of graphics anyways. Alan Wake 2 will not be a better game just because the pores in the wood are rendered at all times.

        A $600 PC runs everything if you learn to ignore this one, meaningless attribute.

        • calzone_gigante@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          This, i loved the original Alan Wake for it’s story, i wouldn’t care at all if the second game had the exact same graphics. The industry wants to push for graphics because it is very simple for them to improve that, just put more time/money on the assets, hire actors to do mocap and not think about anything else, that’s as souless as the movie industry.

      • ayaya@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The Series X and the PS5 are both roughly around the performance of a 6700XT, possibly lower depending on where you look. Any “4K” that is happening is upscaling. Most games run on the equivalent of low or medium settings, use dynamic resolution, checkerboard rendering, or for big games like Starfield or Elden Ring will run at 30fps.

        • Styxie@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Look, you’re welcome to nitpick graphical fidelity, but I think current gen console games running on a 4k tv look excellent. They’re also a fraction of the price compared to PC hardware. That’s a better proposition compared to PC gaming these days for anyone looking to get into gaming. I get that that’s not a popular viewpoint among the PC crowd, but that’s why I posted it.

          • ayaya@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The point isn’t how good they look, the point is that it’s not actually 4K. You can run your PC games at 1080p on a 4K screen and get the same experience. That’s what DLSS and FSR are already doing. And if both are $500 it’s not a fraction of the price it’s the same price. Actually over time PC is cheaper because you’re not paying $60/year for online.

            After 5 years your $500 console actually cost $800. That’s $300 you could have spent on more games or on a stronger GPU that can maybe actually run higher resolutions or higher framerates. At the end of the day consoles are the illusion of a good value. It is smoke and mirrors.

            • Styxie@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I looked it up, and a 6700XT costs the same price as a PS5/Xbox in my country. Add onto that all of the extra components you’ll need to build a PC and it’s way in excess of what a console costs. Sorry, but the cost of entry for PC just doesn’t compare to consoles.