• Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Oh no. There is a legion of lazy indie “developers” who see AI as a cheap and easy way to avoid the difficult creative aspect of pushing out whatever half-baked idea floats between their ears. Good indie games created by talented developers let go from AAA studios will certainly exist, but it’s going to be even harder to find them under the massive crush of shovelware than it already is.

      • ampersandrew@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Nah, shovelware doesn’t survive very long. We learned this through the “indiepocalypse”, where the number of games that could sustainably release and keep companies afloat eventually leveled out.

        • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Idk, but I still have trouble finding interesting indie titles on my own because of just how many absolutely terrible titles are out there.

          • ampersandrew@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            In my experience, Steam’s recommendation engine has gotten way better over the years, and there’s a good chance you can find something you were looking for just by filtering by the tags that interest you. I was looking for another co-op roguelike after Streets of Rogue, and those tags were enough to point me to Vagante, which I ended up liking even better.

            • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              I’ve never had any luck with algorithmic recommendations actually helping me find anything I’m interested in. I guess it depends on the person.