The word “Master Race” is clearly equivalent to terms which were used by Nazis and so are today’s far right wing and alt-rights.
There are other communities which created similar narratives, especially from the 4chan side, and I think the origin of “PC Master Race” comes from there.
The origin of pcmr is a video by zero punctation.
Ok, my mistake, but does this change the fact that the term still characterizes structural racism? Also, due to the nature of anonymity, we cannot know much about the motivations of any particular person on the internet. 4chan and alt right are exactly where you least expect them to be.
Total non-issue
In my experience, if you let a hate group co-opt a term or euphemism, it emboldens them in that usage.
For example, “Oh you did the OK symbol 👌? That’s a white supremacy symbol.” No it isn’t, in most contexts it means OK and in some cultures it represents a butthole.
So by using “master race” for a trivial and humorous concept that a person’s choice of OS makes them superior to others, it belittles its xenophobic usage. A person’s race or skin colour is (or should be) just as irrelevant as OS choice when it comes to their place in society.
This is just cringe. You realize the term “master race” in this context is derived from “PC master race” which in turn was coined as part of the console gamers vs. PC gamers rivalry, i.e. the “console ‘tards” vs. “PC gamer master race”… sigh…
This take is as cringy as gamergate, TBH.
Are you finding issues where there really isn’t any?
Well then let’s just not talk about discrimination. Easy fix
Glad you agree
We live in a so called attention economy. That makes your rather negligent overuse of the term “discrimination” a problem because it shifts attention to situations where it’s easy to argue that discrimination is negligible or doesn’t exist at all. That in turn means people are less likely to have any attention left to inform themselves about cases with actual discrimination.
Basically, comments like yours are what I’d make if I wanted to stifle progress and foster structural racism. Heck, maybe you actually are a bad faith actor.
This reeks of thought policing. If language doesn’t contain the “bad words” you can’t think about it. I for one will not support a society that strives to become doubleplus good.
Language is more than just what Orwell thought it is.
Language can be harmful to others and recreate structures, which harm others.
I wish you wouldn’t use the word “harm”. I find that term hateful and hurtful.
Thank you OP, for your important comment! The unthinking use of Nazi vocabulary only unnecessarily reproduces their rhetoric. It’s not about language policing, it’s about knowledge of history, a sense of appropriateness and style of language. Unfortunately, most people here don’t want to deal with this, yet it is an important part of “Never Again.” Unfortunately, the U.S. is running blindly into a new fascism, and language in particular is a catalyst. It helps the fascists push the boundaries of what can be said (and maybe done).
