• glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I am not but the museum stash is surely due to space! Can’t have every artifact on display or the museum would be the size of the city.

      As for private collectors, work from famous artists rarely goes down in value…so rich people “invest” on storing thousands of paintings to make their finances look lower. It’s a tax evasion scheme honestly and the fact that it deprived people from seeing said works makes it even worse imo

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        to make their finances look lower. It’s a tax evasion scheme honestly

        Buying art has the same effect on taxes as buying shares of Berkshire Hathaway, which is to say no effect at all until you sell.

      • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        First of all, you have to acknowledge there is a finite area for proper display. Secondly, this happens more in the artifact world than the fine art world. Third, not all parts of a collection are as good or even ready to display. Some are in need of restoration. Some are inferior to others on display. Lastly, museums like to rotate displays to help visitors see something fresh. All this doesn’t mean that museum storage areas are not interesting. The Smithsonian has a very interesting one which I was lucky to lost in when I was a child.