• Noit@lemm.eeOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    On top of the ULEZ? That does feel rough, is it actually double-dipping or is it entirely complementary to the ULEZ?

    • NuPNuA@lemm.eeM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well the ULEZ money goes to the GLA and this will go to the local council so it’s more two different parties dipping than double dipping.

      • Noit@lemm.eeOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not a big fan of that. End result for the citizens is that you’ve got one bit of local government stinging you in one spot and another bit of local government getting you on top. Given there’s nothing stopping another London council from putting in place another ULEZ-adjacent levy, it’s going to make driving into London confusing as fuck. I’d rather the ULEZ charge was just higher. Better a single centralised cost. Yeah, your colleagues are going to be getting some very angry phone calls.

        • NuPNuA@lemm.eeM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, I assume the goal is to stop driving in and around London being an option bar the essential journeys.