You talk about context, and then come out with that shit?! The context here is that OPs dad misgendered her (OP indicates that this is something that has been going on for a while, to a point where it has caused irreparable damage to their relationship) so by means of retaliation to this particular interaction, but assumingly out of frustration of the constant bullshit he puts her through, she takes a photo of her vagina and sends it to her dad… Both are acting out of malice; ergo, both are cunts.
Ahh that one is easy: because it’s not a sex crime. Feel free to tell me the statute if I missed something here. Sex crimes include sexual assault, rape and I beleive harassment, however sexual harassment may be covered by other statutes.
You um… you have an email account right?
You uh… ever get spam with unsolicited nudes? Or you know, unsolicited commercial email (spam)? You know how those spammers don’t get fined or thrown in jail? This is because it isn’t a crime, or at least not a well enforced crime.
“Your honor, after paychologically abusing my child for years they sent me a photo of their nude form, something I already have baby photos of. This as I understand it is a crime.”
No, I fucking don’t, but how is a unsolicited pussy pic to your dad not a fucking sex crime.
Defending someone who send unsolicited indecent photos is defending them all… Kindly fuxk off.
You’re a real dumb pile of shit, you know that? Context is key, fuckwit. Learn to argue in good faith or eat shit
Haha, OK, now, please fuck off cunt, you bore me.
You fuck your mother? You’ve been inside her.
This is your lack of logic: “Parent sees child nude. Parent committed crime”
Wouldn’t you rather be smart?
You talk about context, and then come out with that shit?! The context here is that OPs dad misgendered her (OP indicates that this is something that has been going on for a while, to a point where it has caused irreparable damage to their relationship) so by means of retaliation to this particular interaction, but assumingly out of frustration of the constant bullshit he puts her through, she takes a photo of her vagina and sends it to her dad… Both are acting out of malice; ergo, both are cunts.
You’re a dumb pile of shit aren’t ya?
Sure bud. Whatever you say.
“Retaliation to abuse is just the same as abuse, I am very intelligent”
Ahh that one is easy: because it’s not a sex crime. Feel free to tell me the statute if I missed something here. Sex crimes include sexual assault, rape and I beleive harassment, however sexual harassment may be covered by other statutes.
You um… you have an email account right?
You uh… ever get spam with unsolicited nudes? Or you know, unsolicited commercial email (spam)? You know how those spammers don’t get fined or thrown in jail? This is because it isn’t a crime, or at least not a well enforced crime.
“Your honor, after paychologically abusing my child for years they sent me a photo of their nude form, something I already have baby photos of. This as I understand it is a crime.”
So you are defending the sending of unsolicited indecent photos.
Both OP and OPs dad are cunts in this situation.
Defending someone sending an indecent photos to an unwilling recipient is defending them all.
Kindly fuck off.
You’re a real dumb pile of shit, or are willfully acting in bad faith. Context is key, fuckwit.