• MuuuaadDib@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    How many doctors and researchers will you need to accept this isn’t a normal biological find? They have had others already investigate them, and at what point do we accept their findings? If you think this doctor’s credentials do not meet the criteria for respectable what is respectable? I am honestly curious, I can shrug and say ok so that’s interesting and move on, my life literally doesn’t change.

    • FreeBooteR69@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Lots, more than a university nobody has heard of. There’s a number of prestigious universities and medical sciences facilities out there. Peer reviewed and properly critiqued. That’s how science works, more professional people the better.

      • MuuuaadDib@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ok, so all the best and most favored colleges study it and say it’s real, then what? Then what happens, your reality implodes life changes? Or it doesn’t matter and you continue on. Just like exactly what happens now, with these doctors studying this and saying it’s real.

        • FreeBooteR69@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          If the evidence survives a rigorous peer reviewed process and a plurality of scientists agree, then i’ll believe it.

          • MuuuaadDib@lemm.eeOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ok so it is found to be an NHI, and then what? Will your world implode? Will you pivot to ghosts and cryptids to rail against in your quest to dismiss things that you don’t like? I think it’s interesting, but it’s not going to change my life, if we meet NHI and they give us free energy then I will care.

            • FreeBooteR69@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              No, i think it is healthy to have a questioning mind and not just accept anything somebody says. I don’t believe in ghosts, big foot, ogopogo , or visiting aliens. Do i think life exists elsewhere even though i have no aliens on hand to prove it, yes. I believe it’s likely life exists elsewhere because all the components necessary for life to exists exists here and throughout the universe. If life can evolve here it can evolve somewhere else.
              The problem i have with the idea of visiting aliens is the time and distances involved. It just seems incredibly unlikely any machine or life could survive for such long periods in the vastness of space. Does it mean i think it’s impossible, no, just unlikely. So if somebody comes to me with a tale of thousand year old corpses of aliens, i’m going to be skeptical and demand proof.
              The UFO world is full of grifters and delusional people and being skeptical of outlandish claims is natural and a sign of a healthy thinking mind.

              • MuuuaadDib@lemm.eeOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ok so why do you care? What if all of that is real, and you are very wrong, then what? So, you are wrong and it’s all real and your life doesn’t change. Why do you think it necessary to worry about this in the first place and try to dismiss or debunk anything? Real or fake, it doesn’t matter, but you are wasting real time in your life on this tilting at paranormal windmills.

                  • MuuuaadDib@lemm.eeOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    So part of any discovery is being objective, do you think your bias would allow you to be objective, or are you dismissing things with bias before the data comes out? Such as personal attacks on the people investigating such as respected doctors? How do you stay objective and look at things while also announcing you do not believe in anything?