• muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I read the report then went and spoke to my engineering proffessor for nuclear engineering and confirmed that csiro where being dickheads. Why not include it anyways and still give that disclaimer and let the people judge still seems misleading to totally leave it out.

    • ⸻ Ban DHMO 🇦🇺 ⸻@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      How would people be able to accurately judge the cost factors of a solution which cannot be priced properly as there are no projects to compare with? It would be completely useless in the report. That’s without considering the time it would take for the supposedly “cheaper” Nuclear option to be operational. It would’ve been a good idea maybe 30-40 years ago, but it would not be suitable today considering the urgency of climate change

      • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        First there ars more large scale nuclear plants globaly bullshit we dont have a comparison. Second we dont know that they didnt run the numbers so we cant make the comparison.