maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoOmegle has shutdown with a thoughtful farewell from the founderwww.omegle.comexternal-linkmessage-square62fedilinkarrow-up1451arrow-down111cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldinternet@lemmy.eco.brtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmit.onlinehackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1440arrow-down1external-linkOmegle has shutdown with a thoughtful farewell from the founderwww.omegle.commaegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square62fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldinternet@lemmy.eco.brtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmit.onlinehackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
minus-squareDudeDudenson@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoYou’ll just end with companies making the “dark web” mainstream and just turning it into shit just like they’re doing with the regular web
minus-squareinterdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoAs opposed to remaining in the festering shit pile that old web is becoming ?
minus-squareDudeDudenson@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoJust saying making the dark web easier to use isn’t a solution, as soon as it gets mass adoption you’re right back to square one
minus-squareinterdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoNo the underlying structure is going to change the nature of it. Yes it will eventually get corrupted and the next thing will address that too.
You’ll just end with companies making the “dark web” mainstream and just turning it into shit just like they’re doing with the regular web
As opposed to remaining in the festering shit pile that old web is becoming ?
Just saying making the dark web easier to use isn’t a solution, as soon as it gets mass adoption you’re right back to square one
No the underlying structure is going to change the nature of it. Yes it will eventually get corrupted and the next thing will address that too.